A simple method for an ultra-large electrical-size circular polarization antenna measurement

Tian, Keyan; Zhang, Yiqian; You, Lizhi

doi:10.1109/apcap.2014.6992634

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To quantify the measured results, both The different polarization method measurements conducted are characterized by being ■ repeated 20 times [35] for the MACM and PPM and 10 times [35] for the RSM ■ performed by two different persons ■ performed over a period of several weeks. The gain and polarization loss are determined as described in [36]- [38]. A transmission measurement between two identical reference antennas is performed, obtaining the S21 scattering coefficient.…”

Section: Comparison Of Simulation and Measurement Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Statistical Analysis Applied to Simulating and Measuring Circularly-Polarized Millimeter-Wave Antennas [Measurements Corner]

Reniers

Liu

Rousstia

et al. 2019

IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the "Taverne" license above, please follow below link for the End User

show abstract

Section: Comparison Of Simulation and Measurement Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%