2008
DOI: 10.1155/2008/358654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simple and Rapid RP‐HPLC Method for the Estimation of Nevirapine in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms

Abstract: A reverse phase HPLC method is described for the determination of nevirapine in tablet dosage forms. Chromatography was carried on an ODS column using a mixture of methanol and water (89:11 v/v) as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 1 mL/min with detection at 284 nm. The retention time of the drug was 3.22 min. The detector response was linear in the concentration of 25-200 mcg/mL. The limit of detection and limit of quantification was 0.004 and 0.0121 mcg/mL respectively. The percentage assay of nevirapine wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most successful analysis technique requires high specificity, sub-nanograms detection limits in biological fluids and robustness. Various reported methods for NVP determination, involves use of reverse phase liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC [Kabra et al, 2009;Mohanraj et al, 2008], capillary electrophoresis , HPLC-UV [Marinho et al, 2014], LC-MS/MS [Zhang et al, 2010] and GC-MS [Vogel et al, 2010]. Some of these methods have low sensitivity, time consuming sample preparation and costly (equipment and analysis).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most successful analysis technique requires high specificity, sub-nanograms detection limits in biological fluids and robustness. Various reported methods for NVP determination, involves use of reverse phase liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC [Kabra et al, 2009;Mohanraj et al, 2008], capillary electrophoresis , HPLC-UV [Marinho et al, 2014], LC-MS/MS [Zhang et al, 2010] and GC-MS [Vogel et al, 2010]. Some of these methods have low sensitivity, time consuming sample preparation and costly (equipment and analysis).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%