2001
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44593-5_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Similarity-Based Approach to Attribute Selection in User-Adaptive Sales Dialogs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The induced similarity-based ranking will rank equally all these exactly matching products. Conversational recommender systems are characterized by the fact that, when faced with these failure problems, they initiate an interaction with the user in order to refine the current query (Aha and Breslow 1997;Göker and Thomson 2000;Kohlmaier et al 2001;Gupta et al 2002;Shimazu 2001). These systems have mostly focused on the large results set problem, and when the user query returns too many results, these systems pose questions to the user to obtain additional preferences to further specify the current query.…”
Section: Recommendation Techniques and Failing Queriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The induced similarity-based ranking will rank equally all these exactly matching products. Conversational recommender systems are characterized by the fact that, when faced with these failure problems, they initiate an interaction with the user in order to refine the current query (Aha and Breslow 1997;Göker and Thomson 2000;Kohlmaier et al 2001;Gupta et al 2002;Shimazu 2001). These systems have mostly focused on the large results set problem, and when the user query returns too many results, these systems pose questions to the user to obtain additional preferences to further specify the current query.…”
Section: Recommendation Techniques and Failing Queriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These systems have mostly focused on the large results set problem, and when the user query returns too many results, these systems pose questions to the user to obtain additional preferences to further specify the current query. The questions are determined using feature-selection methods (Doyle and Cunningham 2000;Kohlmaier et al 2001;Shimazu 2001) that exploit information theory principles (e.g., information gain [Quinlan 1986;Witten and Frank 2000]), to identify the attributes with higher discriminatory power. In other words, they select a feature and generate a corresponding question.…”
Section: Recommendation Techniques and Failing Queriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In previous researches on knowledge-based recommender systems the problem of dealing with the failure of an over-constrained query was typically addressed by exploiting similarity-based retrieval [7,8]. In Trip@dvice [2], as well as in other proposals [9], it is argued that the system should not autonomously determine the best attainable approximate match, as in a similarity-based retrieval, but should actively support the user and let him understand what is the best relaxation/compromise.…”
Section: Interactive Query Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%