2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30077-9_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supporting User Query Relaxation in a Recommender System

Abstract: Abstract. This paper presents a new technology for supporting flexible query management in recommender systems. It is aimed at guiding a user in refining her query when it fails to return any item. It allows the user to understand the culprit of the failure and to decide what is the best compromise to chose. The method uses the notion of hierarchical abstraction among a set of features, and tries to relax first the constraint on the feature with lowest abstraction, hence with the lightest revision of the origi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Classical approaches to preference relaxation (Mirzadeh & Ricci, 2007;Mirzadeh, Ricci, & Bansal, 2004), referred to here as Standard Preference Relaxation (see Section 3.1) may increase consumers' decision-making performance through positive effects on decision quality. Nevertheless, the major disadvantage of the Standard Preference Relaxation approach is an increase in decision effort (see section 4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classical approaches to preference relaxation (Mirzadeh & Ricci, 2007;Mirzadeh, Ricci, & Bansal, 2004), referred to here as Standard Preference Relaxation (see Section 3.1) may increase consumers' decision-making performance through positive effects on decision quality. Nevertheless, the major disadvantage of the Standard Preference Relaxation approach is an increase in decision effort (see section 4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the example above, a consumer using such a product search tool, and who provided preferences on price ($7000 to $8000) and mileage (25000mi to 75000mi) would be presented with a result set with only those offers that fully satisfy all the stated criteria, that is, are both within the price and mileage range. This approach is often referred to as product filtration using hard-constraints or logical filtering (Mirzadeh & Ricci, 2007) and has many limitations acknowledged in the literature (Dabrowski & Acton, 2010b;Felfernig, Mairitsch, Mandl, Schubert, & Teppan, 2009;Mirzadeh, Ricci, & Bansal, 2004), addressed with recommendation method, for example through preference relaxation.…”
Section: Preference Relaxation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See (Mirzadeh et al, 2004;Jannach, 2006a;Jannach, 2006b) for discussions of relaxation strategies for interactive recommender systems.…”
Section: Recommendation Algorithm: Which Reasoning Paradigm Does the mentioning
confidence: 99%