A roadmap to the Collaboration Maturity Model (CollabMM) evolution

Magdaleno, Andréa Magalhães; Araújo, Renata Mendes de; Werner, Cláudia Maria Lima

doi:10.1109/cscwd.2011.5960062

Cited by 21 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…We are dealing with a volatile and highly competitive global environment (Alonso et al , 2010). Such a competitive environment requires organizations to innovate at a fast pace to deliver new products and services in order to meet the demands of consumers (Magdaleno et al , 2011). Organizations are struggling to attain a competitive edge in this global market fostered by new economies of scale (Alonso et al , 2010).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Moreover, the influence of the digital revolution at the personal and organizational level is changing socioeconomic aspects and the way of interoperation and collaboration among individuals and enterprises (Alonso et al , 2010). The need and advantages of collaboration have been recognized, yet many organizations still find it difficult to encourage and establish collaborations (de Wit-de Vries et al , 2019; Magdaleno et al , 2011; Borrelli et al , 1995). There are accelerated efforts to encourage collaborations, and existing literature points out several types of collaboration forms.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A framework to improve university–industry collaboration

Awasthy

Flint

Sankarnarayana

et al. 2020

JIUC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to propose a framework to improve the effectiveness of university–industry collaboration (UIC). This work enhances the existing body of literature and knowledge regarding collaboration and offers concrete steps to be taken for effective collaboration between universities and industries.Research MethodologyA literature review to study the best practices, impediments to collaboration and the various models proposed in the past for successful UIC was conducted. A workshop and focus-group meetings of practitioners and academic researchers was designed and organised to explore the current state of the university–industry engagement within the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) region and gather inputs regarding possible approaches to improve collaboration. The findings from the literature review and the results from this qualitative research regarding the approaches to improve the effectiveness of the collaboration were analysed.Results and implicationsThe study discovers that various measures have been proposed in the form of best practices or models to improve the effectiveness of UIC. However, these measures often address a specific concern such as technology transfer, intellectual property (IP), etc. There is a scope for a comprehensive holistic framework to address many aspects of UIC in order to improve effectiveness and achieve success. A framework for improving the effectiveness of collaboration considering a comprehensive list of factors operating in a broad context within the collaboration system was proposed.Originality/valueThe framework builds on previous literature dealing with measures for successful UIC. However, it is the first of its kind, in the researcher's knowledge, in terms of comprehensiveness of the factors contributing to establishing and sustaining successful collaboration. The value of the individual experience of the participants in this qualitative research, which is on average more than 10 years in the software engineering field, validates the importance and quality of the data collected. The addition of these results to the framework increases its validity.The framework can be utilised by universities and industry practitioners to foster successful and effective collaboration. The results have significant relevance, particularly within the Australian context as the government has intensified the adoption of measures to encourage and improve collaboration between universities and the industry.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A framework to improve university–industry collaboration

Awasthy

Flint

Sankarnarayana

et al. 2020

JIUC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Kian ketatnya persaingan bisnis menyebabkan industri harus mampu berinovasi untuk menyediakan produk atau jasa baru untuk memenuhi permintaan konsumen (Magdaleno et al, 2011). Dengan bekerja sama dengan universitas, industri akan dapat memperoleh ideide baru yang akan berguna dalam proses inovasi produk.…”

Section: Pendahuluanunt -Or Around 125 Percent Of Total Gdpunclassified

Untitled

Cecilia¹,

Ismoyo²

2022

idealog

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Saat ini busana ready-to-wear memiliki permintaan pasar yang tinggi. Perancangan yang tepat sasaran terhadap kebutuhan ini akan memberikan solusi desain yang merupakan karya estetika yang baik dan sekaligus bisnis yang berkelanjutan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memaparkan proses desain produk fesyen ready-to-wear yang terintegrasi dengan konsep bisnis desain. Penelitian merupakan eksperimen riil dalam fase perancangan untuk menciptakan sebuah brand yang dapat diterima target pasar dengan kolaborasi institusi pendidikan dan industri garmen atau tekstil. Melalui metode proses design thinking berbasis eksperimen, desain dengan objek ready-to-wear berlangsung kurang lebih 6 bulan dengan tahapan mendesain bisnis fesyen bersama stakeholder yang simultan dengan tahapan desain fesyen. Karya desain telah melalui proses review dari expert dan calon pengguna. Hasil studi adalah konsep desain ready-to-wear, implementasi desain berupa produk fesyen, serta konsep model bisnis beserta brand dan marketing collateral. Secara fokus, desain koleksi busana ready-to-wear telah menghasilkan konsep dan realisasi desain dalam dua belas looks, serta berbagai implementasi brand collateral terkait bisnis fesyen. Kata kunci : desain fesyen, ready-to-wear, merek fesyen, kolaborasi akademisi dan industri, design thinking

show abstract

“…We selected two MMs as alternatives. The MMs we selected were Magdaleno's Collaboration MM and Clark's Organizational Interoperability MM [61,62]. The ratings of these MMs were also low.…”

Section: Soft Governancementioning

confidence: 99%

IT Governance Maturity: Developing a Maturity Model Using the Delphi Method

Smits¹,

Hillegersberg²

2015

2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To advance in maturity, organizations should pay attention to both the hard and soft sides of IT governance (ITG). The hard side is related to processes and structure, the soft side to social aspects like behavior and organizational culture. This paper describes a study to develop an ITG maturity model (MM) that includes both. Our research method is based on literature study, the Delphi method and makes use of a Group Decision Support System. We chose to design a focus area MM. In this type of MM maturity is determined by a set of focus areas. The study reveals one MM as being appropriate for hard ITG. For soft ITG we found no single model appropriate. Soft governance needs more specific capabilities defined for each focus area individually. Based on knowledge from literature and experts we selected models for each focus area. Three alternatives for informal organization need further research.

show abstract

A roadmap to the Collaboration Maturity Model (CollabMM) evolution

Cited by 21 publications

References 19 publications

A framework to improve university–industry collaboration

A framework to improve university–industry collaboration

Untitled

IT Governance Maturity: Developing a Maturity Model Using the Delphi Method

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About