2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2015
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2015.541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IT Governance Maturity: Developing a Maturity Model Using the Delphi Method

Abstract: To advance in maturity, organizations should pay attention to both the hard and soft sides of IT governance (ITG). The hard side is related to processes and structure, the soft side to social aspects like behavior and organizational culture. This paper describes a study to develop an ITG maturity model (MM) that includes both. Our research method is based on literature study, the Delphi method and makes use of a Group Decision Support System. We chose to design a focus area MM. In this type of MM maturity is d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The developed plans will be helpful when different maturity levels exist or are required at different processes, (d) track improvement progress, (e) benchmark governance best practices, and (f) map governance activities to those responsible for their design and operating effectiveness. Another important aspect to note when dealing with organizational governance maturity is the organization's assessment of its maturity (Wilkinson, 2014;Smits et al, 2015). The concept of maturity frameworks is well known and accepted within the business environment as organizations realize that maturity frameworks can be of great value, especially when benchmarking the organisation's performance (Gomes, 2018;Kerzner, 2005).…”
Section: Maturity Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The developed plans will be helpful when different maturity levels exist or are required at different processes, (d) track improvement progress, (e) benchmark governance best practices, and (f) map governance activities to those responsible for their design and operating effectiveness. Another important aspect to note when dealing with organizational governance maturity is the organization's assessment of its maturity (Wilkinson, 2014;Smits et al, 2015). The concept of maturity frameworks is well known and accepted within the business environment as organizations realize that maturity frameworks can be of great value, especially when benchmarking the organisation's performance (Gomes, 2018;Kerzner, 2005).…”
Section: Maturity Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MIG model was developed using design science to measure hard and soft ITG [34] because an ITG maturity model covering both parts of governance did not exist [14], [18], [35]. In this study, we applied the MIG model and the corresponding MIG assessment instrument [14], [36].…”
Section: Itg Maturitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ITG maturity model was the focus of the study of Smits and Van Hillegersberg, which focuses on the hard and soft sides of IT governance (Smits & Van Hillegersberg, 2015. Their study reveals an ITG maturity model as being appropriate for hard ITG.…”
Section: It Governance Behavioral Approachrelated Workmentioning
confidence: 99%