A review on tool supports for security requirements engineering

Yahya, Syazwani; Kamalrudin, Massila; Sidek, Safiah

doi:10.1109/icos.2013.6735072

Cited by 11 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Taking into account the security support, seven requirement engineering tools were analysed in [48]. Covered features for the analysis were methodology (e.g., model-driven engineering, goal-oriented approach, Secure Tropos), the source of security element, the requirement formality, and the support for the requirements engineering activities (i.e., elicitation, specification, analysis, and verification).…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Analysis of the Features of Requirements Engineering Tools

Ozkaya,

Kardas,

Kose

2023

Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many requirements engineering tools have been developed for gathering, documenting, and tracing requirements that can even be further processed for such purposes as analysis and transformation. In this study, we analysed 56 different requirements engineering tools for a comprehensive set of features that are categorised into multiple viewpoints (i.e., project management, specification, collaboration, customisation, interoperability, methodology, and user-support). The analysis results led to many interesting findings. Some of them are as follows: (i) the project planning and execution activities are rarely supported, (ii) multi-user access and versioning are highly supported, (iii) the most popular specification technique is natural languages, while precise specification via modeling languages is rarely supported, (iv) requirements analysis is rarely supported, (v) requirements transformation is considered for generating documents only, (vi) tool customisation via the tool integration and API support is highly popular, while customising the notation set is rarely supported, (vii) exchanging requirements is popular in such standards as ReqIF and Excel/CSV, while no single standard is accepted by all the tools, (viii) agile development is very common, while other methodologies (e.g., MDE and SPLE) are rarely supported, and (ix) user-guides, telephone, e-mail, and videos are the most preferred methods for user-support. The analysis results will be useful for different stakeholders including practitioners, tool vendors, and researchers.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Analysis of the Features of Requirements Engineering Tools

Ozkaya,

Kardas,

Kose

2023

Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Yahya et al [126] conducted a review on tool supports for security requirements engineering. The study has evaluated seven tools developed to deal with security requirements engineering and identified the problems and gaps existing.…”

Section: Background and Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Security Requirements Engineering: A Framework for Cyber-Physical Systems

Réhman¹,

Allgaier

Gruhn

2018

2018 International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology (FIT)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

I would firstly like to thank God-Almighty for not only the ability, but also the constant strength and perseverance that kept me going through this thesis.Further, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my supervisor, Professor Volker Gruhn, who has been a steady guide through the course of my research and has always been supportive of my academic endeavours -no matter which corner of the Earth they led me to -thereby allowing me to interact with and learn from excellent researchers in my field from around the globe. I am thankful for dedicating his time and effort and for always making me feel welcome at his office. I would also like to express my appreciation for Professor Matthias Book, who not only offered deep critical insights through his review of my thesis, but also went out of his way to make available to me certain academic opportunities that I found to be extremely valuable.I would also like to extend my thanks to all my colleagues in Paluno. It has been a great experience working with and exchanging ideas with them. All the talks, discussions and dissertation seminars have been invaluable experiences for me.Last but not least, I would like to give thanks to my family, particularly my mother, who has always been a pillar of support for me, and without whom I would not be where I stand today. I thank her for her prayers, her emotional support and for always giving me advice when I hit a rough patch in life and don't know what to do. My wife too, has been a constant source of strength for me, a companion, a friend and both a mother and father for my children in my absence. I thank her for all of this and for not killing me when I told her I would be living in a different country for the next three years. I'd like to thank my daughter Eshal and my son Shaheer for bearing with me patiently and not holding against me the time I could not give them in pursuit of my doctoral studies.

show abstract

“…Outros trabalhos de pequisa avaliaram ferramentas de ERS, como por exemplo [Carrillo De Gea et al 2012], [Zowghi and Coulin 2005], [Carrillo de Gea et al 2011] e [Yahya et al 2013]. Porém, ao contrário de trabalhos que se concentram em atividades ou aspectos específicos de ERS, como [Zowghi and Coulin 2005] e [Yahya et al 2013], as características aqui analisadas abrangem todas as cinco principais categorias de atividades da ERS e mais um conjunto de características gerais de ferramentas de apoio a ERS.…”

Section: Conclusõesunclassified

Avaliação por experiência de usuário de ferramentas que apoiam a engenharia de requisitos no contexto de Micro e Pequenas Empresas

Araújo¹,

Oliveira²,

Machado³

et al. 2017

Anais Do XVI Simpósio Brasileiro De Qualidade De Software (SBQS 2017)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As pesquisas em Engenharia de Requisitos de Software (ERS) tem desenvolvido soluções para diversos problemas da área. Todavia, tais soluções são focadas para os ambientes das grandes organizações. Este trabalho responde a seguinte questão de pesquisa: As ferramentas existentes para apoiar a ERS são adequadas para o contexto de MPEs produtoras de software? Para responder essa questão foi realizada uma seleção e avaliação empírica de ferramentas para ERS, com base em características apresentadas pela norma ISO 24766. Os resultados apontaram que as ferramentas avaliadas não são apropriadas para as necessidades das MPEs. As conclusões obtidas confirmam e estendem resultados similares disponíveis na literatura e apontam a necessidade de evoluir as ferramentas ERS para contemplarem as idiossincrasias das MPEs.

show abstract

A review on tool supports for security requirements engineering

Cited by 11 publications

References 17 publications

An Analysis of the Features of Requirements Engineering Tools

An Analysis of the Features of Requirements Engineering Tools

Security Requirements Engineering: A Framework for Cyber-Physical Systems

Avaliação por experiência de usuário de ferramentas que apoiam a engenharia de requisitos no contexto de Micro e Pequenas Empresas

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About