2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on modification methods to cellulose-based adsorbents to improve adsorption capacity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
310
0
9

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 857 publications
(322 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
0
310
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Monomer-grafting enables attaching many different functional groups to the backbone of cellulose. Another method of attaching new specific groups to the cellulose is direct modification in which new groups are bonded to hydroxyl groups through chemistries such as base solutions, mineral and organic acid solutions, organic compounds or oxidizing agents [21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monomer-grafting enables attaching many different functional groups to the backbone of cellulose. Another method of attaching new specific groups to the cellulose is direct modification in which new groups are bonded to hydroxyl groups through chemistries such as base solutions, mineral and organic acid solutions, organic compounds or oxidizing agents [21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, chemical composition modification, especially those in which bioactive molecules are introduced, might add new biological functions to any material, which becomes a biomaterial. Some strategies have been applied to achieve new derivatives of cellulose (bacterial or vegetal), including composites formation and attaching material by covalent bond [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]13]. The latter represents an elegant methodology due to the finesse of the modification at molecular level forming a better know structure material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percent fluoride adsorption was found to vary with initial solution pH. Because OH − and F − are isoelectronic species but OH − is more active than F − , OH − can compete with F − during the adsorption process . As a result, most of the adsorbent material for F − needs to be used under acidic conditions, which is not a suitable pH for drinking water.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%