2022
DOI: 10.1515/polyeng-2021-0059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on 3D printing in tissue engineering applications

Abstract: In tissue engineering, 3D printing is an important tool that uses biocompatible materials, cells, and supporting components to fabricate complex 3D printed constructs. This review focuses on the cytocompatibility characteristics of 3D printed constructs, made from different synthetic and natural materials. From the overview of this article, inkjet and extrusion-based 3D printing are widely used methods for fabricating 3D printed scaffolds for tissue engineering. This review highlights that scaffold prepared by… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This technology has widely emerged as an alternative manufacturing approach compared to conventional manufacturing techniques thanks to its ability to create complicated geometries for multimaterials with intricate features in decreased processing time for manufacturing. [177][178][179][180][181][182][183] 3D printing of SRPs utilizes the same commercial AM technologies to develop smart structures for different engineering applications. [184] However, 3D printers should be compatible with these smart materials or exhibit multimaterial characteristics for the cases where deformation mismatch within the structure causes functional or shape change.…”
Section: Am Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technology has widely emerged as an alternative manufacturing approach compared to conventional manufacturing techniques thanks to its ability to create complicated geometries for multimaterials with intricate features in decreased processing time for manufacturing. [177][178][179][180][181][182][183] 3D printing of SRPs utilizes the same commercial AM technologies to develop smart structures for different engineering applications. [184] However, 3D printers should be compatible with these smart materials or exhibit multimaterial characteristics for the cases where deformation mismatch within the structure causes functional or shape change.…”
Section: Am Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When we associate the handling time of any AM procedure on average with the standard production method, AM procedure makes a 38 mm cube for about 1 hour while injection modeling can make less identical cubes per minute. Therefore, 3D printing is not suitable for use as a massproduction element of any product [141].…”
Section: Future Aspects and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Medical implants fabricated by this additive manufacturing technique have better surface, mechanical properties, and biocompatibility, compared with traditional manufacturing methods. Consequently, 3Dprinted implants have been applied to major medical fields such as dentofacial, tracheobronchial, cardiovascular, orthopedics, skin wound healing, amongst others (18). Thus, there is a real need for a fast standardization of regulations for these medical products (17).…”
Section: Custom-made Device and D Printingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scaffolds obtained by different 3D-printing technologies (e.g., extrusion-based, inkjet) as sparked much interest because their performance properties can be tuned according to a specific aim (18). Moreover, multifunctional scaffolds can be combined with drug delivery strategies with or without the use of external stimulus (e.g., magnetic, electric, phototermal) (21).…”
Section: Personalized D-printed Sca Oldsmentioning
confidence: 99%