2017 52nd International Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/upec.2017.8231871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review of electrical metering accuracy standards in the context of dynamic power quality conditions of the grid

Abstract: Numerous changes in electrical grid schemes, like the inclusion of renewable energy, the rise of non-linear loads and the emergence of electric vehicle charging, increases variable power quality conditions of the grid. In this dynamic scenario where energy could flow in both directions and the waveforms could be highly distorted, accuracy becomes a crucial factor for the correct measurement of electrical energy and power values. Errors in the assessment of these values have significant ramifications for revenu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We introduce DEFEAT, a robust feature attribution-based detection strategy aimed at safeguarding DSSE by detecting the presence of malicious data. Through comprehensive 4 The European standard for energy meters (EN 50470-3:2006) allows measurement error of up to ±2.5% [30]. evaluation, we demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach in identifying FDIAs and adversarial attacks generated using various surrogates, even in the presence of measurement noise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We introduce DEFEAT, a robust feature attribution-based detection strategy aimed at safeguarding DSSE by detecting the presence of malicious data. Through comprehensive 4 The European standard for energy meters (EN 50470-3:2006) allows measurement error of up to ±2.5% [30]. evaluation, we demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach in identifying FDIAs and adversarial attacks generated using various surrogates, even in the presence of measurement noise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The individual measurement errors are obtained using (22). Subsequently, the following condition regarding the acceptable difference limit determined by 𝜀 53 has to be met:…”
Section: Proposed Testing Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influencing conditions, coming from real DSs, are further discussed in the literature, which reports the results when meters 2 > REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR MANUSCRIPT ID NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK HERE TO EDIT) < were exposed to non-ideal power quality conditions [22] including harmonic distortion [23]- [24], and dynamic variations [25]- [26]. However, to the best of our knowledge, the ability of RMs (on individual outputs) to distinguish energy import and export under fast (frequent) changes in the power direction (e.g., as a result of active energy management in a prosumer's installation behind their meter) has not been considered; except a preliminary work from some of the authors [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement devices such as smart meters do have some errors in their measurements. As per the European measurement instruments directive, the maximum permissible errors for electricity meters are ±2.5% and ±2.0% at the minimum and maximum current flows, respectively [31].…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Dsse To Measurement Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%