A Research Framework for Sustainable Digital Innovation: Case Studies of Japanese Firms

Abstract

Today’s competitive and highly volatile environment calls for a new kind of flexibility and adaptability. Limited studies are available that examine how firms achieve both speed and creativity requirements in this digital era. In view of the rare empirical studies on real-world cases that apply rigorous research methods for sustainable digital innovation (SDI), this research investigates the key strategic requirements of organizational agility and flexibility for SDI. The research framework defines four types of innovators. This study used the benchmark tool to assess the status of their innovation effectiveness. This research framework is useful for firms to classify, assess, and evaluate their innovation type. The study’s findings also suggest the road map for future strategic goals. This theoretical framework illustrates the causal relationship between Japanese-style digital innovation and the firms’ sustainable competitive advantage. This model might be extended to other firms in different contexts (e.g., Korea, India, USA, Brazil, and a host of other countries). The theoretical and practical implications are discussed for future research.

The Role of Organizational Unlearning in Manufacturing Firms’ Sustainable Digital Innovation: The Mechanism of Strategic Flexibility and Organizational Slack

“…Unlearning rigid routines in traditional manufacturing processes is a fundamental step in learning with the aim of sustainable digital innovation. The search for sustainable digital innovation can be achieved by linking incumbent business with digital technologies [62], or by speeding up digital innovation [63]. For one thing, organizational unlearning provides firms with resource flexibility and coordination flexibility, and incurs better performance in digital innovation, which magnifies firms' competitive advantage in traditional manufacturing, and makes them sustainable in the digital era.…”

Digital innovations for micro, small and medium enterprises in the net zero economy: A strategic perspective

“…There are few studies (Berawi et al, 2020; Serpa, 2019) that look at how businesses meet speed and innovation demands in this digital era. The primary strategic needs of organizational agility and flexibility for long‐term digital innovation are examined by Park and Hong (2022). The results of the study also provide a roadmap for future strategic objectives.…”

Technology-enabled leadership and performance enhancement outcomes: an empirical investigation from the dynamic capabilities perspective

“…Dynamic capabilities allow businesses to adapt their strategy and operations, yielding comprehensive performance results (Chen et al , 2015; Mikalef et al , 2020). Effective knowledge management and product innovation can lead to better firm performance and enhancement of competitive advantage (Chen et al , 2022; Donate and Sánchez de Pablo, 2015; Park and Hong, 2022; Tan and Ramayah, 2018). Such knowledge-sharing platforms are offered by leadership that leverages technology to achieve its goals.…”

“…Accumulated information and insight help direct leadership efforts resulting in innovation. Sustained knowledge management practices, both in creation and application, lead to knowledge generation, which positively affects innovation inside the organization (Hong et al, 2014;Khalili, 2017;Park and Hong, 2022;Zheng et al, 2010). TEL (e.g.…”