1985
DOI: 10.2307/843373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Reply to Peel and Slawson's Review of "A Generative Theory of Tonal Music"

Abstract: Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may explain why the panels after echoic onlookers and metonymic selective framing (both with [framing] features) were slower than those after onomatopoeia, despite all being explicit. Both our standardized beta-weights and our additional analyses of dominance and importance (see online repository) suggest that features may exert various levels of strength in relationship to one another, like ‘preference rules’ in dynamic systems described in approaches to the cognition of music or in theories of Gestalt psychology (Jackendoff & Lerdahl, 2006; Lerdahl et al, 1985). As this is the first study to investigate these inferencing techniques in this way, future studies can better assess the relative influences and constraints on these features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may explain why the panels after echoic onlookers and metonymic selective framing (both with [framing] features) were slower than those after onomatopoeia, despite all being explicit. Both our standardized beta-weights and our additional analyses of dominance and importance (see online repository) suggest that features may exert various levels of strength in relationship to one another, like ‘preference rules’ in dynamic systems described in approaches to the cognition of music or in theories of Gestalt psychology (Jackendoff & Lerdahl, 2006; Lerdahl et al, 1985). As this is the first study to investigate these inferencing techniques in this way, future studies can better assess the relative influences and constraints on these features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Cohn (2019) posited that various features can describe the informativeness of each technique, as in Table 1. These features could be just descriptive theoretical constructs, or they may function psychologically in a ‘preference rule’ system described in approaches to the cognition of music or in theories of Gestalt psychology (Jackendoff & Lerdahl, 2006; Lerdahl et al, 1985). Preference rules are a characterization of principles involved in a dynamic system where features may exert various levels of strength in a context, thereby competing with each other to lead to an interpretation of a stimuli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And the difficulty we may have in analytically choosing which note is prolonged in such a gesture may be heightened when the first note is placed on a downbeat and the second note belongs to a clear stepwise melodic strand. This is the source of the well-known debates between those who claim the Kopfton in Mozart's A major Piano Sonata (K. 331) first-movement theme is C# and those who claim it is E (Schenker 1925, Lerdahl and Jackendoff 1983, Peel and Slawson 1984; the C# is on a downbeat, the E is higher, and both belong to clear stepwise melodic strands.…”
Section: One Could Also Imagine a Similar Taxonomy Of What They Call mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The term seems to imply that an event hierarchy must consist-at every level-of events that actually occur on the surface of the music being analyzed. Perhaps one reason why this misconception seems widespread is the influence of the work of Lerdahl and Jackendoff (1983). Lerdahl now (1988) describes his "prolongational reductions" as "event hierarchies."…”
Section: Prolongation and Hierarchiesmentioning
confidence: 96%