1997
DOI: 10.2307/843763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Problem of Prolongation in "Tonal" Music: Terminology, Perception, and Expressive Meaning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
31
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…226-227), and "Tonality may thus be defined as prolonged motion within the framework of a single key-determining progression, constituting the ultimate structural framework of the whole piece" (p. 227). This quote, and the work of later theorists such as Larson (1997) and Väisälä (2002), suggests that prolongation is not confined to the "high art" of "commonpractice" composers such as Bach, Beethoven and Brahms. The idea of "unfolding of a basic sonority, expressing tonality in the horizontal plane" may also be applied to related ("pretonal," "posttonal") music.…”
Section: Larson (1997) Continuedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…226-227), and "Tonality may thus be defined as prolonged motion within the framework of a single key-determining progression, constituting the ultimate structural framework of the whole piece" (p. 227). This quote, and the work of later theorists such as Larson (1997) and Väisälä (2002), suggests that prolongation is not confined to the "high art" of "commonpractice" composers such as Bach, Beethoven and Brahms. The idea of "unfolding of a basic sonority, expressing tonality in the horizontal plane" may also be applied to related ("pretonal," "posttonal") music.…”
Section: Larson (1997) Continuedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Straus (1987, cited by Larson, 1997), Prolongation is an idea of extraordinary power. It has afforded remarkable insights into common-practice music, enabling us to hear through the musical surface to the remoter structural levels and ultimately to the tonic triad itself (p. 1).…”
Section: Incorporating Schenker Into Music Psychologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Incluso la participación pasiva en la audición compromete la activación de regiones del cerebro que se vinculan al movimiento (Lakoff, & Johnson, 1999;Janata, & Grafton, 2003;). Será la correlación entre diferentes tipos de conocimiento básico en las interacciones de los individuos en entornos cotidianos, entre diferentes dominios de la experiencia y el dominio musical, lo que llevará a procesos metafóricos de aprehensión de significado gracias a la flexibilidad cognitiva y social que nos caracteriza como especie (Guck 1991;Zbikowsky, 1997Zbikowsky, , 1997Zbikowsky, -1998Zbikowsky, , 1998Zbikowsky, , 2002Saslaw 1996 Saslaw , 1997 Saslaw -1998Larson 1997; Brower 2000; Cross, 2004).Así, el significado en general y el musical en particular, deben entenderse como fundados en la humanidad (Johnson, 1987): nuestra capacidad para construir significado, basada en las estructuras imaginativas por las que aprehendemos la realidad. Y ese significado que lo que atribuimos será básico para que la motivación lleve a un desencadenamiento de respuestas a lo escuchado, pero también a la inversa, la motivación hacia lo escuchado será lo que desencadene diferentes emociones en nosotros.…”
unclassified
“…Importantly, both hierarchies can be understood as cognitive templates imposed upon music by listeners, rather than actual phenomena present in musical signals (Huron, 2006). Metrical patterns need not be consistently emphasized with relatively strong and weak accents in order to be perceived (London, 2004) just as tonally stable pitches do not need to be emphasized in order for a tonal hierarchy to be understood (Larson, 1997). In fact, much evidence points to listeners imposing hierarchies with very little musical context in both metric (Brochard et al, 2003;Desain & Honing, 2003;Palmer & Krumhansl, 1990) and tonal domains (Cuddy & Badertscher, 1987;Smith & Schmuckler, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%