2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4888183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A relationship between statistical time to breakdown distributions and pre-breakdown negative differential resistance at nanometric scale

Abstract: Using an ultra-high vacuum Conductive atomic force microscopy (C-AFM) current voltage, pre-breakdown negative differential resistance (NDR) characteristics are measured together with the time dependent dielectric breakdown (TDDB) distributions of Si/SiON (1.4 and 2.6 nm thick). Those experimental characteristics are systematically compared. The NDR effect is modelled by a conductive filament growth. It is showed that the Weibull TDDB statistic distribution scale factor is proportional to the growth rate of an … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To go further in the description of charge dynamic during injection, the study on charge injection and surface potential measurements was completed with C-AFM measurements. The C-AFM measurements were performed by using the second device structure (figure 1(b)) and a diamond With respect to the current measurements, one can say that Fowler-Nordheim conduction is most likely the mechanism controlling the current in ultrathin layers [23,25,27,28]. However, for the interpretation of these results, in term of transport laws, the current density needs to be computed, which requires estimation of the current collection area.…”
Section: Charges Dynamic During Injection: Current Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To go further in the description of charge dynamic during injection, the study on charge injection and surface potential measurements was completed with C-AFM measurements. The C-AFM measurements were performed by using the second device structure (figure 1(b)) and a diamond With respect to the current measurements, one can say that Fowler-Nordheim conduction is most likely the mechanism controlling the current in ultrathin layers [23,25,27,28]. However, for the interpretation of these results, in term of transport laws, the current density needs to be computed, which requires estimation of the current collection area.…”
Section: Charges Dynamic During Injection: Current Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C-AFM measurements were performed at room temperature with an Omicron AFM/scanning tunneling microscopy system under UHV (≤109 Torr) with conductive diamond tips (B doped). The AFM tip was used as a grounded top electrode (tip area = 5nm 2 [14]), and a negative voltage was applied to the substrate. By convention, all of the current-voltage characteristics are presented according to a positive gate voltage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tip/sample contact area determined by fitting the tunneling current as a function of voltage was 5 nm 2 . Due to this small contact area, the tunneling current is lower than at device scale providing new insights in pre breakdown current characteristics [13], [14]. The comparison of tests at device scale with studies carried out at nanometric scale using the conductive tip of an atomic force microscope (C-AFM) as upper electrode [15] shows that even at this area range, the cumulative failure probability of monolayer gate oxides presents a Weibull behavior.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In its origin CAFM, was mainly used to characterize the electrical properties of thin (<50 nm) dielectric materials (i.e., SiO 2 , HfO 2 , Al 2 O 3 ) at nanoscale. More specifically, the CAFM can be used to study tunneling current, polycrystallization, charge trapping and de‐trapping, random telegraph noise, stress induced leakage current (SILC), dielectric breakdown, and resistive switching . Recently, its use has also expanded to other low‐dimensional materials, such as nanowires (NWs), carbon nanotubes (CNT), nanodots, and 2D materials .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%