2020
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6668/ab9542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A record-high trapped field of 1.61 T in MgB2 bulk comprised of copper plates and soft iron yoke cylinder using pulsed-field magnetization

Abstract: A trapped field of B T = 1.61 T was experimentally achieved at the central surface of an MgB 2 bulk composite (60 mm in diameter and 20 mm in height) at 20 K by double pulsed-field magnetization (PFM) using a split-type coil. The composite bulks consisted of two MgB 2 ring bulks sandwiched by thin copper ring plates, which were then stacked, and a soft iron yoke cylinder was inserted in the central bore of the rings. The copper ring plates delayed the rise time and duration of the magnetic pulse due to eddy cu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We relate this to the negative role played by flux jumps in MgB 2 PFM. Indeed in MgB 2 bulks, the iterative pulsing leads to the flux front uniformly penetrating the sample without flux jumps, as shown in figure 10 [26]. This behaviour is commonly explained by the reduction in heat generated with repeated pulsing [27,26].…”
Section: Factors Influencing Final Trapped Fieldmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We relate this to the negative role played by flux jumps in MgB 2 PFM. Indeed in MgB 2 bulks, the iterative pulsing leads to the flux front uniformly penetrating the sample without flux jumps, as shown in figure 10 [26]. This behaviour is commonly explained by the reduction in heat generated with repeated pulsing [27,26].…”
Section: Factors Influencing Final Trapped Fieldmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Indeed in MgB 2 bulks, the iterative pulsing leads to the flux front uniformly penetrating the sample without flux jumps, as shown in figure 10 [26]. This behaviour is commonly explained by the reduction in heat generated with repeated pulsing [27,26]. However, the interplay between the remanent magnetisation and penetrating flux is still not well understood.…”
Section: Factors Influencing Final Trapped Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, bulk superconducting rings are more susceptible to thermomagnetic instabilities during the PFM process, making it very challenging to magnetize samples of this geometry to high trapped fields. Thus, in the literature to date, reported trapped fields in bulk superconducting rings magnetized by PFM are less than 0.35 T at the centre of a single ring bulk compared to those magnetized by FC [10,11,12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In 2014, Durrell et al reported a trapped field of 17.6 T at 29 K in a stack of two silver doped GdBCO superconducting bulk samples [46]. A record-high trapped field of 16.1 T in MgB 2 bulk has been recently achieved at 20 K by Hirano et al using pulsed-field magnetization (PFM) [47]. The possibility of the application of bulk superconductors to electrical machines has been discussed by many researchers.…”
Section: Superconducting Materials Applied To Electrical Machinesmentioning
confidence: 99%