2013
DOI: 10.2478/msr-2013-0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Proposal for Simplifying the Method of Evaluation of Uncertainties in Measurement Results

Abstract: The paper deals with the innovative ways of nonstandard, simplifying applications of the valid method for evaluating uncertainties in measurement results and with the definition of conditions of their usability. The evaluation of a substitute criterion for measurement accuracy by means of a relative difference between the measurand and its reference value is proposed. This nonstandard relative uncertainty is comparable with the overall relative standard uncertainty in the measurement result, and thus the evalu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The tracing, evaluation and single measuring lengths equal to 4.8, 4.0 and 0.8 mm, respectively. Due to the porous surface, the non-contact methods for surface roughness [47] were not possible to be used, inter alia because of the uncertainties in measurement results [48]. According to the EN ISO 4287:1999 [49] and DIN 4768 [50] standards, the following roughness parameters have been measured: arithmetic mean of the sum of roughness profile values (Ra), mean peak-tovalley height (Rz DIN ), ten-point height (Rz ISO ), root- mean-square deviation of the roughness profile (Rq), total height of the roughness profile (Rt), mean width of the roughness profile elements (RSm), the ratio of the developed profile length to the evaluation length (L 0 ) and profile peak density (D).…”
Section: D Roughness Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tracing, evaluation and single measuring lengths equal to 4.8, 4.0 and 0.8 mm, respectively. Due to the porous surface, the non-contact methods for surface roughness [47] were not possible to be used, inter alia because of the uncertainties in measurement results [48]. According to the EN ISO 4287:1999 [49] and DIN 4768 [50] standards, the following roughness parameters have been measured: arithmetic mean of the sum of roughness profile values (Ra), mean peak-tovalley height (Rz DIN ), ten-point height (Rz ISO ), root- mean-square deviation of the roughness profile (Rq), total height of the roughness profile (Rt), mean width of the roughness profile elements (RSm), the ratio of the developed profile length to the evaluation length (L 0 ) and profile peak density (D).…”
Section: D Roughness Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tracing, evaluation and single measuring lengths, equal to 4.8, 4.0 and 0.8 mm, respectively, were used. Due to the porous surface, the non-contact methods for surface roughness [57] were not possible to be used, inter alia because of the uncertainties in measurement results [58]. According to the EN ISO 4287:1999 [59] and DIN 4768 [60] standards, the following roughness parameters have been measured: arithmetic mean of the sum of roughness profile values (Ra), mean peak-to-valley height (Rz DIN ), ten-point height (Rz ISO ), mean-square deviation of the roughness profile (Rq), total height of the roughness profile (Rt), mean width of the roughness profile elements (RSm), the ratio (l 0 =L/L 0 ) of the developed profile length (L) to the evaluation length (L 0 ) and profile peak density (D).…”
Section: Methods and Experimental Set Upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tracing, evaluation, and single measuring lengths were equal to 4.8, 4.0, and 0.8 mm, respectively. Due to the porous surface, non-contact methods for surface roughness [81] were not possible to be used, inter alia, because of the uncertainties in measurement results [82]. According to the EN ISO 4287:1999 [83] and DIN 4768 [84] standards, the following roughness parameters have been measured: arithmetic mean of the sum of roughness profile values (Ra), mean peak-to-valley height (Rz DIN ), root mean square deviation of the roughness profile (Rq), total height of the roughness profile (Rt), the ratio of the developed profile length to the evaluation length (L 0 ), and profile peak density (D).…”
Section: D Roughness Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%