A proposal for REST with XMPP as base protocol for intercloud communication

Stanik, Alexander; Kao, Odej

doi:10.1109/iisa.2016.7785436

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The IoT-PIC deploys the discovery functionality of devices through the XMPP protocol. New devices connected are automatically registered to the network, describing their functionalities with a common format [44]. Particularly, in the proposed solution, when a new device connects to the network, the manager of this network publish-subscribe joins in PIC-M for all discovered resources.…”

Section: Iot Network Management Protocolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Management Platforms and Protocols for Internet of Things: A Survey

Silva

Rodrigues

Al‐Muhtadi

et al. 2019

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Internet of Things (IoT) management systems require scalability, standardized communication, and context-awareness to achieve the management of connected devices with security and accuracy in real environments. Interoperability and heterogeneity between hardware and application layers are also critical issues. To attend to the network requirements and different functionalities, a dynamic and context-sensitive configuration management system is required. Thus, reference architectures (RAs) represent a basic architecture and the definition of key characteristics for the construction of IoT environments. Therefore, choosing the best technologies of the IoT management platforms and protocols through comparison and evaluation is a hard task, since they are difficult to compare due to their lack of standardization. However, in the literature, there are no management platforms focused on addressing all IoT issues. For this purpose, this paper surveys the available policies and solutions for IoT Network Management and devices. Among the available technologies, an evaluation was performed using features such as heterogeneity, scalability, supported technologies, and security. Based on this evaluation, the most promising technologies were chosen for a detailed performance evaluation study (through simulation and deployment in real environments). In terms of contributions, these protocols and platforms were studied in detail, the main features of each approach are highlighted and discussed, open research issues are identified as well as the lessons learned on the topic.

show abstract

Section: Iot Network Management Protocolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Management Platforms and Protocols for Internet of Things: A Survey

Silva

Rodrigues

Al‐Muhtadi

et al. 2019

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The IC paradigm is supported by the definition of specific protocols and format that allow to create a network of clouds where content, storage, and computing functionalities are ubiquitous and interoperable [9]. The IC is composed of three main elements [33], which are shown in Figure 1: i) the IC Root is the core of the IC, which hosts the root servers containing all common mechanisms used by clouds participating to the IC, such as Naming Authority, Trust Authority, and Directory services. It acts as a broker in the IC overlay network and hosts a global cloud resource catalog which can be explored in order to discover desired cloud services; ii) the IC eXchange Points (ICXPs) are Neutral Access Points where clouds can interoperate and IC traffic can be properly handled (similarly to IXPs for network traffic).…”

Section: Reference Architecture For Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To exchange information among the providers participating to the IC, we propose to use the XMPP protocol. Indeed, XMPP enables the near-real-time exchange of small pieces of structured data which are called XML stanzas [33]. XMPP specifies three types of XML stanzas: i) message, used to exchange messages among two entities over the XMPP overlay network; ii) presence, used to expose the availability of an entity in the XMPP overlay network; iii) Info/Query (IQ), which allows for exchange request and response XML stanza.…”

Section: Reference Architecture For Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

QoE-Aware OTT-ISP Collaboration in Service Management

Floris

Ahmad

Atzori

2018

ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is a matter of fact that quality of experience (QoE) has become one of the key factors determining whether a new multimedia service will be successfully accepted by the final users. Accordingly, several QoE models have been developed with the aim of capturing the perception of the user by considering as many influencing factors as possible. However, when it comes to adopting these models in the management of the services and networks, it frequently happens that no single provider has access to all of the tools to either measure all influencing factors parameters or control over the delivered quality. In particular, it often happens to the over-the-top (OTT) and Internet service providers (ISPs), which act with complementary roles in the service delivery over the Internet. On the basis of this consideration, in this article we first highlight the importance of a possible OTT-ISP collaboration for a joint service management in terms of technical and economic aspects. Then we propose a general reference architecture for a possible collaboration and information exchange among them. Finally, we define three different approaches, namely joint venture, customer lifetime value based, and QoE fairness based. The first aims to maximize the revenue by providing better QoE to customers paying more. The second aims to maximize the profit by providing better QoE to the most profitable customers (MPCs). The third aims to maximize QoE fairness among all customers. Finally, we conduct simulations to compare the three approaches in terms of QoE provided to the users, profit generated for the providers, and QoE fairness.

show abstract

“…Due to its own virtue, IoT specific communication protocols have been selectively added into this layer for energy efficient, resource constraint and light weight information processing in robotic systems. MQTT [22], CoAP [23], XMPP [24], IPv6 [25], UDP [26], uIP [27], DTLS [28], AMQP [29], LLAP [30], and DDS [31] protocols pave the following tasks respectively: publish/subscribe messaging, multicast support, real-time instant messaging, packet switched networking, alternative to TCP, disseminating of networked embed system, providing privacy to datagram protocol, message queuing for middleware environment, lightweight local automation, and directly addressing publish/subscribe based communication for real-time embedded systems.…”

Section: The Internet Layermentioning

confidence: 99%

Internet of Robotic Things: Concept, Technologies, and Challenges

Ray

2016

IEEE Access

197

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Internet of Things allow massive number of uniquely addressable ''things'' to communicate with each other and transfer data over existing internet or compatible network protocols. This paper proposes a new concept which tackles the issues for supporting control and monitoring activities at deployment sites and industrial automations, where intelligent things can monitor peripheral events, induce sensor data acquired from a variety of sources, use ad hoc, local, and distributed ''machine intelligence'' to determine appropriate course of actions, and then act to control or disseminate static or dynamic position aware robotic things in the physical world through a seamless manner by providing a means for utilizing them as Internet of robotic things (IoRT). Although progressive advancements can be seen in multi-robotic systems, robots are constantly getting enriched by easier developmental functionalities, such vertical robotic service centric silos are not enough for continuously and seamlessly supporting for which they are meant. In this paper, a novel concept-IoRT is presented that highlights architectural principles, vital characteristics, as well as research challenges. The aim of this paper is to provide a better understanding of the architectural assimilation of IoRT and identify important research directions on this term. Internet of things, IoRT, robotics, cloud. INDEX TERMS

show abstract

A proposal for REST with XMPP as base protocol for intercloud communication

Cited by 5 publications

References 3 publications

Management Platforms and Protocols for Internet of Things: A Survey

Management Platforms and Protocols for Internet of Things: A Survey

QoE-Aware OTT-ISP Collaboration in Service Management

Internet of Robotic Things: Concept, Technologies, and Challenges

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About