A preliminary reliability and validity study of the Chinese version of the self-efficacy for exercise scale for older adults

Lee, Ling-Ling; Perng, Shoa-Jen; Ho, Ching-Chun; Hsu, Hsiang-Ming; Lau, Shu-Chuan; Arthur, Antony

doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.09.003

Cited by 79 publications

(75 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…According to the definition chosen in the present study (McHorney and Tarlov, 1995), no important floor or ceiling effects were present, which increases the usability of the scale. The results of the internal consistency are similar to other studies (Lee et al, 2009;Resnick and Jenkins, 2000;Resnick, Luisi, Vogel, and Junaleepa, 2004).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Aspects of reliability and validity of the Swedish version of the Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale for older people

Rydwik

Hovmöller

Boström

2013

Physiotherapy Theory and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim was to test aspects of reliability and validity of a Swedish version of the Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale (SEE-SV) for older people. Floor and ceiling effects, item-total correlation, internal consistency, test--retest reliability, content and construct validity were tested on 39 older people, mean age 72 years (SD 3.3). Content validity was also tested on five physical therapists. The results showed no floor and ceiling effects. The ICC for the total score was 0.79 (95% CI 0.61-0.89). The median weighted kappa coefficients square for the individual items was 0.63. Item-to-total correlation varied between 0.64 and 0.86 and Cronbach's Alpha for all items was >0.92. The correlations between SEE-SV and the SF-36 Mental Health and Bodily Pain subscales were r(s) = 0.50 and r(s) = 0.30 (ns), respectively. The correlation between SEE-SV and self-assessed physical activity was r(s) = 0.13 (ns). Eighty-nine percent responded that the items were relevant and 92% that no item should be excluded. All physical therapists considered the items relevant, but the written instructions could be improved. In conclusion, SEE-SV has good item-to-total correlation, satisfactory internal consistence and substantial test--retest reliability. Our results show satisfactory content validity; however, studies are needed to further evaluate construct validity and to evaluate other aspects such as predicitve validity and responsiveness.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Aspects of reliability and validity of the Swedish version of the Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale for older people

Rydwik

Hovmöller

Boström

2013

Physiotherapy Theory and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…One such measure, the Self-Efficacy for Exercise scale (SEE), was developed and verified as a valid and reliable tool in older populations, 17 and further applied to African American and Latino older adults 18 in the United States. The SEE has also been translated into Chinese 19 and Swedish, 20 and these two translated versions were evaluated for the reliability and validity in samples of Taiwanese and Swedish population. We found no scale in Korean for self-efficacy for exercise for older adults available; thus, we deemed the SEE scale a suitable choice for measuring self-efficacy expectation because it is developed specifically for older adults and easily applicable to them, owing to its short length.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric evaluation of the Korean Version of the Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale for older adults

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Ao excluir qualquer um dos itens que compõem os fatores, o valor de α diminuiu, confirmando que todos os itens contribuem de forma importante para a construção dos fatores. Estes valores são semelhantes aos relatados em adultos brasileiros 12 que demonstraram valores de α de Cronbach de 0,83 (caminhada) e 0,90 (atividade física moderada e vigorosa) e em outros estudos internacionais 6,17,18 . Um estudo realizado com adultos e idosos brasileiros apontou um α = 0,90 11 .…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

“…O coeficiente de correlação intraclasse também foi significativo, tanto na caminhada (CCI = 0,78; p < 0,001) quanto na atividade física moderada e vigorosa (CCI = 0,86; p < 0,001). Estes resultados confirmam a estabilidade temporal da escala de autoeficácia para atividade física em idosos, sendo similar a resultados obtidos em outras amostras de idosos 6,17 .…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Validade e fidedignidade de uma escala para avaliar autoeficácia para a atividade física do idoso

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Este estudo teve como objetivo analisar a validade fatorial confirmatória e a fidedignidade de uma escala de medida da autoeficácia para atividade física em idosos. Participaram 118 idosos (78% mulheres), com idade entre 60 a 90 anos. Para avaliar a análise fatorial confirmatória utilizou-se o programa Mplus 6.1. A fidedignidade foi testada pela consistência interna e estabilidade temporal. A escala original foi composta por cinco itens com resposta dicotômica (não/sim), de maneira independente para caminhada e atividade física moderada e vigorosa. O item relacionado à confiança em realizar atividade física quando o mesmo está de férias foi excluído. Foram identificados dois construtos denominados "autoeficácia para caminhada" e "autoeficácia para atividade física moderada e vigorosa", com carga fatorial ≥ 0,50. Houve adequados valores de consistência interna, tanto para caminhada (> 0,70) quanto para atividade física moderada e vigorosa (> 0,80) e de estabilidade temporal para todos os itens. Conclui-se que a escala de autoeficácia para atividade física apresenta validade, consistência interna e fidedignidade adequada para avaliar esse construto em idosos brasileiros

show abstract

A preliminary reliability and validity study of the Chinese version of the self-efficacy for exercise scale for older adults

Cited by 79 publications

References 33 publications

Aspects of reliability and validity of the Swedish version of the Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale for older people

Aspects of reliability and validity of the Swedish version of the Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale for older people

Psychometric evaluation of the Korean Version of the Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale for older adults

Validade e fidedignidade de uma escala para avaliar autoeficácia para a atividade física do idoso

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About