A predictive modelling-based material selection method for sustainable product design

Eddy, Douglas; Krishnamurty, Sundar; Grosse, Ian R.; Wileden, Jack C.; Lewis, Kemper

doi:10.1080/09544828.2015.1070258

Cited by 24 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Most of the reported literature with fuzzy and uncertainty elements integrated with material selection approaches originated from the MCDM domain such as AHP, 44,[161][162][163][164][165][169][170][171] TOPSIS, 166,167,172,173 VIKOR, [174][175][176][177] and ELECTRE. 71 The importance of weighting appropriate and different criteria of materials with various alternatives with linguistics is important for offering an effective solution.…”

Section: Fuzzy and Uncertaintymentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review on material selection methods

Rahim

Musa

Ramesh

et al. 2020

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L:

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Technological advancements and the growing material set in the world have created a large variety of options for industrial designers, but little attention has been given to the tools and methods that support material selection processes. In this paper, we report on a comprehensive systematic literature review (SLR) guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement on methods or approaches reported for supporting material selection processes. This review covers various published literature, spanning from 2000 to 2018. The purpose is to examine in detail the evolution of the extensive body of research, its research streams and to position possible areas for further research. A classification framework consisting of six categories of selection approaches was derived from the extensive literature. Additionally, a detailed analysis of predominant approaches was presented along with their advantages and limitations with respect to the material selection domain. Taken together, the insights gained from this study may be of assistance to new researchers and practitioners who are looking for potential selection methods for their specific applications. The review also found that there is an increasing trend of research in recent years in the area of OR-based method application specifically on the multi-criteria decision-making supporting material selection processes.

show abstract

Section: Fuzzy and Uncertaintymentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review on material selection methods

Rahim

Musa

Ramesh

et al. 2020

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L:

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is notable that while the goals of each paradigm change in response to the behavioural challenges of the time, the focus on artefact objects remains more consistent. Engineering design has also evolved to these changing roles of behaviour in design, by giving special consideration to the human actions in using a technical product (Sun et al 2013;Sun et al 2019), adopting to participatory processes for design of new technologies (Bjögvinsson, Ehn, and Hillgren 2012), to focus on methods for selecting using environment-friendly materials in sustainable design (Eddy et al 2015), and by understanding how personalisation of product form affects emotional bonding (Mugge, Schoormans, and Schifferstein 2009). This underlines the importance of understanding the role of behaviour in engineering design.…”

Section: Understanding the Role Of Behaviour In Seven Paradigms Of Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding behavioural design: barriers and enablers

Khadilkar

Cash

2020

Journal of Engineering Design

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Behavioural design has emerged as an important domain of design research and practice. However, there is a need to better distinguish behavioural design and subsequently map its unique features and challenges. In answer to this need, this work examines the evolving role of behaviour in design and contrasts this with eleven in-depth behavioural design cases. This has resulted in our identification of behavioural design as a new paradigm of design, with a number of unique characteristics. Based on this, we propose a model of behavioural design. Furthermore, we identify three critical barriers to behavioural design in practice, and suggest ten mitigating enablers. Together these findings provide implications for further development of theory, practice, and education in behavioural design.

show abstract

“…However, the study scope is limited to production. In the study done by Eddy et al (2015), a disc brake development is used as a case study to test a predictive modelling for material selection. Eddy…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative life cycle assessment of car disc brake systems—case study results and method discussion about comparative LCAs

Gradin

Hedlund-Åström

2019

Int J Life Cycle Assess

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Two life cycle assessment (LCA) studies comparing a new low-particulate-matter-emission disc brake and a reference disc brake were presented. The purpose was to identify the difference in potential environmental impacts due to a material change in the new disc brake parts. Additionally, the validity was investigated for the simplification method of omitting identical parts in comparative LCA. This was done by comparing the results between the simplified and the full LCA model. Methods The two disc brakes, new disc brake and reference disc brake, were assessed according to the LCA ISO standards. The ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (hierarchist) impact assessment method was chosen. Simplifying a comparative LCA is possible, all identical parts can be omitted, and only the ones that differ need to be assessed. In this paper, this simplification was called comparative LCA with an omission of identical parts. Results and discussion The comparative impacts were analysed over seventeen impact categories. The new disc brake alternative used more resources during the manufacture of one disc compared to the reference disc brake alternative. The shorter life length of the reference disc demanded a higher number of spare part discs to fulfil the same functional unit, but this impact was reduced due to material recycling. The new disc brake impacts were connected primarily to the coating and secondly to the pad manufacture and materials. The validity of the simplification method was investigated by comparing the results of the two LCA models. The impact differences were identical independent of the LCA model, and the same significant impact categories could be identified. Hence, the purpose of the study could be fulfilled, and the simplification was valid. Conclusions Both LCA models, simplified and full, revealed that the new disc brake had limited environmental advantages. The omission of identical parts made it more challenging to determine if an impact was significant or insignificant. The simplification seemed to be reasonable.

show abstract

A predictive modelling-based material selection method for sustainable product design

Cited by 24 publications

References 32 publications

A systematic review on material selection methods

A systematic review on material selection methods

Understanding behavioural design: barriers and enablers

Comparative life cycle assessment of car disc brake systems—case study results and method discussion about comparative LCAs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About