1983
DOI: 10.1121/1.389455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A possible auditory basis for internal structure of phonetic categories

Abstract: We used a selective adaptation procedure to investigate the possibility that differences in the degree to which stimuli within a phonetic category are considered to be good exemplars of the category--that is, differences in perceived category goodness--have a basis at a prephonetic, auditory level of processing. For three different phonetic contrasts (/b-p/, /d-g/, /b-w/), we assessed the relative magnitude of adaptation along a stimulus continuum produced by a variety of stimuli from the continuum belonging t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several experiments have demonstrated the use of prototypes in phonetic categorization (Kuhl, 1991;J. L. Miller, Connine, Schermer, & Kluender, 1983;Samuel, 1982).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several experiments have demonstrated the use of prototypes in phonetic categorization (Kuhl, 1991;J. L. Miller, Connine, Schermer, & Kluender, 1983;Samuel, 1982).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus phonetic categories have an internal structure that is reminiscent of the kind of structure seen for nonspeech perceptual/ cognitive categories (Medin & Barsalou, 1987;Nosofsky, 1988;Rosch, 1978). The internal structure ofphonetic categories is evident in tasks requiring the overt judgment of category goodness (Kuhl, 1991;Massaro & Cohen, 1983;Miller & Volaitis, 1989;Samuel, 1982), as well as in tasks that measure the functional salience of category members by assessing, for example, dichotic competition (Miller, 1977;Repp, 1977), selective adaptation (Miller, Connine, Schermer, & Kluender, 1983;Samuel, 1982), and discrimination (Kuhl, 1991). I The issue we address in the present research concerns the developmental origins of this internal category structure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is some evidence relevant to these issues. For example, it has been demonstrated that members of a phonetic category differ in perceptual potency; certain stimuli are more effective adaptors in selective adaptation experiments (Miller, Connine, Schermer, & Kluender, 1983;Samuel, 1982) and are more effective competitors in dichotic competition experiments (Miller, 1977;Repp, 1977). Moreover, when listeners are asked to rate the category goodness of individual members, it has been shown that individual exemplars vary in the degree to which they are perceived as good exemplars of the category (Grieser & Kuhl, 1989;Kuhl, 1986;Miller & Volaitis, 1989).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%