A Pilot Study of the Naming Transaction Shell

Canfield, Ann M.; Spector, J. M.

doi:10.21236/ada237575

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…4), corresponding to median and maximum fluxes of 0.3 and 25.4 mmol m −2 yr −1 , respectively (Table S-1), or 10-10 3 times smaller than a typical carbonate depositional flux. The larger Type I AC fluxes are found in sites located closer to shelf and slope areas and correspond to higher rates of sedimentation and sulfate reduction (Canfield, 1991). A key characteristic of the Type I sites is that even for those sites with higher AC fluxes (Table S-1) the f AC values are very small (Fig.…”

Section: Relative Carbon Burial Fluxesmentioning

confidence: 94%

Authigenic carbonate formation rates in marine sediments and implications for the marine δ13C record

Mitnick

Lammers

Zhang

et al. 2018

Earth and Planetary Science Letters

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Carbon isotope (δ13C) variations measured in carbonates have been attributed to large-scale phenomena throughout Earth history, such as changes in atmospheric oxygen or global glaciations. These interpretations follow from a model wherein the δ13C of marine dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) is controlled by the relative sedimentary burial rates of biogenic carbonate (BC) and organic carbon (OC). A new model proposes authigenic carbonate (AC) as a third major sedimentary C pool, implying that δ13C anomalies are not necessarily indicative of extreme changes in the global carbon cycle and/or atmospheric oxygen. Two conditions are required for AC formation to significantly alter bulk carbonate δ13C: the AC isotopic composition must be at least ∼3‰ different from that of BC and the AC/BC ratio must be >0.1. We use pore fluid Ca and Sr concentrations to estimate rates of AC formation in Late Cenozoic marine sediments, then calculate relative fractions of AC, OC, and BC. Today AC is not expected to constitute a significant fraction of total sedimentary carbon (AC+OC+BC) globally; however, there are modern sites where local conditions promote elevated AC/BC and anaerobic metabolisms can alter the δ13C of pore fluids. We investigate these sites to determine what conditions might enable AC to alter δ13C of marine DIC. We find there is very little net addition of AC relative to BC, but large quantities of AC form today across many settings via recrystallization. In settings where remineralization of organic matter causes recrystallized carbonate to form with modified δ13C, AC/BC is generally too low for this recrystallization to significantly shift the δ13C of the bulk carbonate. However, exceptions are found in sites with very low BC and extensive methane oxidation, suggesting that this environment type would need to be globally extensive in the past in order for AC formation to change the δ13C of marine DIC.

show abstract

Section: Relative Carbon Burial Fluxesmentioning

confidence: 94%