A Participação Popular e os Paradigmas da Administração Pública

Abstract

A participação popular nas decisões públicas tem sido tema recorrente nas discussões acadêmicas e dentro da própria burocracia pública. Este artigo demonstra a dificuldade de compatibilização da participação popular com a configuração atual da administração pública brasileira. Esta dicotomia entre participação popular e os paradigmas da administração é identificada através de revisão bibliográfica e está relacionada a diversos atributos da Administração Pública, principalmente nas características patrimonialistas e pela luta de poder existente em seu interior. Desta forma, as conclusões apontam para uma tendência de incompatibilidade do patrimonialismo com o modelo democrático participativo, requerido na Constituição 1988.

Nomeações políticas nos governos municipais e performance burocrática: avaliando o desempenho

“…The study tested whether the existence of APs with more training was a differential factor in explaining the variation in the proxies used as a measure of institutional performance between municipalities. The t-test for independent samples was used with the GDP per capita data 2014/15, IGM 2016, and IFDM 2014and 2015 The result of the first analysis shows that, on average, GDP per capita 2014 was higher for the municipalities that had APs with more training than those with APs with less training. Municipalities with APs with more training had an average of 19,243.07 and EP = 896.69; and those with APs with least training had an average of 16,581.56 and EP = 571.07; with t (803) = 2.50, p <0.05.…”

“…In practice, the implementation of the democratic constitutional mechanisms was conducted through a political decentralization of the state, overcoming the authoritarian and centralizing government practices observed in the previous period (a few years before the 1988 Brazilian Federal Constitution, the country was subjected to an authoritative military government). Also, these mechanisms contributed to building a new organizational model anchored in participatory management (Cardoso & Nunes, 2015;Frazece & Abrucio, 2009).…”

Political appointments in municipal governments and bureaucratic performance: evaluating achievement

“…The study tested whether the existence of APs with more training was a differential factor in explaining the variation in the proxies used as a measure of institutional performance between municipalities. The t-test for independent samples was used with the GDP per capita data 2014/15, IGM 2016, and IFDM 2014and 2015 The result of the first analysis shows that, on average, GDP per capita 2014 was higher for the municipalities that had APs with more training than those with APs with less training. Municipalities with APs with more training had an average of 19,243.07 and EP = 896.69; and those with APs with least training had an average of 16,581.56 and EP = 571.07; with t (803) = 2.50, p <0.05.…”

“…In practice, the implementation of the democratic constitutional mechanisms was conducted through a political decentralization of the state, overcoming the authoritarian and centralizing government practices observed in the previous period (a few years before the 1988 Brazilian Federal Constitution, the country was subjected to an authoritative military government). Also, these mechanisms contributed to building a new organizational model anchored in participatory management (Cardoso & Nunes, 2015;Frazece & Abrucio, 2009).…”