2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.105050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel multiplex electrochemiluminescent immunoassay for detection and quantification of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and anti-seasonal endemic human coronavirus IgG

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to SARS-CoV-2 RBD, we identified cross-reactive antibodies, albeit to a lesser extent, against SARS-CoV-2 Spike and Nucleocapsid and SARS-CoV-1 Spike in 2013 and 2020, consistent with other published findings ( 19 , 24 ). The greater cross-reactivity observed in anti-RBD in comparison to anti-spike is not unexpected due to the larger % CVs and 95% confidence intervals for specificity of RBD, as we previously described in our assay validations ( 22 ). Additionally, the MSD assay utilizes recombinant proteins printed onto the surface of the plate, and does not account for any post-translational modifications occurring in vivo .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition to SARS-CoV-2 RBD, we identified cross-reactive antibodies, albeit to a lesser extent, against SARS-CoV-2 Spike and Nucleocapsid and SARS-CoV-1 Spike in 2013 and 2020, consistent with other published findings ( 19 , 24 ). The greater cross-reactivity observed in anti-RBD in comparison to anti-spike is not unexpected due to the larger % CVs and 95% confidence intervals for specificity of RBD, as we previously described in our assay validations ( 22 ). Additionally, the MSD assay utilizes recombinant proteins printed onto the surface of the plate, and does not account for any post-translational modifications occurring in vivo .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Of the 40 sera previously identified as sero-positive on at least one CLIA platform, we identified 19/40 as sero-positive by a validated MSD algorithm ( 22 ), which requires a positive result on 2 of the 3 SARS-CoV-2 targets tested. 1/19 was previously positive for only one CLIA target and was a sample collected in March 2020, and the remaining 18/19 were previously positive for at least two CLIA targets (4 were collected in May and 14 were collected in September 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to monoplex assays such as ELISA, multiplex serological assays can simultaneously measure antibodies to multiple antigens, allowing for more epidemiological information to be obtained from a single test. It has been demonstrated that multiplex assays can have higher accuracy than monoplex assays [ 11 , 12 ]; can distinguish vaccinated from naturally infected individuals [ 13 ]; can provide estimates of the time since previous infection [ 3 ]; and can simultaneously measure immunity to seasonal coronaviruses [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference positive samples were defined as paired serum samples with signals above the MSD-recommended target thresholds for anti-spike (S) and/or anti-nucleocapsid (N) and/or anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) IgG (S = 1,960, N = 5,000, and RBD = 538) ( 14 ). Serum samples were classified as positive for SARS-CoV-2 anti-IgG when signal for two of three targets was greater than or equal to the threshold ( 32 ). Agreement between targets has better efficiency and increased sensitivity to detect low-level antibody responses than a single epitope ( 33 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%