2019
DOI: 10.1101/690750
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel multidimensional reinforcement task in mice elucidates sex-specific behavioral strategies

Abstract: AbstractBackgroundSex is a critical biological variable in the neuropathology of psychiatric disease, and in many cases, women represent a vulnerable population. It has been hypothesized that sex differences in neuropsychiatric disorders are manifestations of differences in basic reward processing. However, preclinical models often present rewards in isolation, ignoring that ethologically, reward seeking requires the consideration of potential… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is likely that differences in protein expression at baseline interact with drug actions on reward systems to alter druginduced molecular plasticity and may provide a framework that can explain sex differences in both vulnerability and the trajectory of SUD. Understanding the interaction between these factors is particularly relevant as significant work has suggested that males and females have different behavioral strategies, especially as it relates to reward and reinforcement behavior 12 . These sexspecific behavioral strategies have been largely linked to rewardrelated brain regions like the nucleus accumbens (NAc), where manipulations of this area (either directly or via manipulations of projections into the NAc) are capable of blocking/inducing these differences in behavior [12][13][14] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is likely that differences in protein expression at baseline interact with drug actions on reward systems to alter druginduced molecular plasticity and may provide a framework that can explain sex differences in both vulnerability and the trajectory of SUD. Understanding the interaction between these factors is particularly relevant as significant work has suggested that males and females have different behavioral strategies, especially as it relates to reward and reinforcement behavior 12 . These sexspecific behavioral strategies have been largely linked to rewardrelated brain regions like the nucleus accumbens (NAc), where manipulations of this area (either directly or via manipulations of projections into the NAc) are capable of blocking/inducing these differences in behavior [12][13][14] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the interaction between these factors is particularly relevant as significant work has suggested that males and females have different behavioral strategies, especially as it relates to reward and reinforcement behavior 12 . These sexspecific behavioral strategies have been largely linked to rewardrelated brain regions like the nucleus accumbens (NAc), where manipulations of this area (either directly or via manipulations of projections into the NAc) are capable of blocking/inducing these differences in behavior [12][13][14] . Thus, a major goal of this study was to focus on basal sex differences in motivation and protein expression in the NAc, and how these interact with cocaine selfadministration to dictate the molecular and behavioral adaptations that occur following cocaine exposure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is problematic as it not only selects for male-type behavioral profiles but can also mask sex-differences in subsequent drug-associated behaviors. Several studies have demonstrated that female and male mice employ unique behavioral strategies in operant reinforcement tasks [61]. As such, if sex is to be accurately considered as a biological variable in behavioral, circuit, and molecular analyses, training paradigms and selection criteria should be able to parse volitional intake while taking into account baseline behavioral differences between male and female subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each statistical test is denoted with the appropriate statistics in the results section. We also used a computational analysis to determine the parameters of response bias (Log b), as described previously [36][37][38]. Briefly, Log b was computed as the measure for behavioral bias using a logarithmic scale for the multiplication of the ratio between correct and incorrect responses:…”
Section: Analysis Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies to explicitly test whether the reviewed mechanisms are present in females, the microcircuits are organized the same way between the sexes, or whether they affect dopamine release to a similar extent in both sexes have not been completed to date. Furthermore, while work has focused on how sex interacts with aspects of substance use (Siciliano, 2019; Townsend, Negus, Caine, Thomsen, & Banks, 2019), depression (Ma, Xu, Wang, & Li, 2019), motivation, and the dopaminergic mechanisms underlying these phenotypes (Becker & Koob, 2016; Johson et al, 2019; Kutlu et al, 2020), it remains mostly unclear how sex interacts with the specific local terminal regulatory mechanisms outlined in this review to drive these behaviors. Taken together, lack of understanding of how terminal dopamine is modulated in both males and females will further impede the development of pharmaceuticals to many neuropsychiatric conditions involving dopamine dysfunction, including substance use disorder (Correa鈥怐e鈥怉raujo, 2006).…”
Section: Expanding Our Understanding Of Dopamine Release Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%