2021
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/abe39b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel motor imagery EEG decoding method based on feature separation

Abstract: Objective. Motor imagery electroencephalography (EEG) decoding is a vital technology for the brain–computer interface (BCI) systems and has been widely studied in recent years. However, the original EEG signals usually contain a lot of class-independent information, and the existing motor imagery EEG decoding methods are easily interfered by this irrelevant information, which greatly limits the decoding accuracy of these methods. Approach. To overcome the interference of the class-independent information, a mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They were usually focused on the methods to improve the prediction accuracy [5,8,23,[30][31][32], raise the number of commands [12,33], increase the information transfer rate (ITR) [34][35][36][37][38], or reduce the training efforts [7,30,34,39]. To enhance the prediction accuracy, new classification algorithms [30,40,41] or feature extraction methods have been proposed [31,32,42]. Recent BCI studies frequently applied deep learning algorithms for high accuracy [5,23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were usually focused on the methods to improve the prediction accuracy [5,8,23,[30][31][32], raise the number of commands [12,33], increase the information transfer rate (ITR) [34][35][36][37][38], or reduce the training efforts [7,30,34,39]. To enhance the prediction accuracy, new classification algorithms [30,40,41] or feature extraction methods have been proposed [31,32,42]. Recent BCI studies frequently applied deep learning algorithms for high accuracy [5,23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BP in [8,30] Hz CSP Particle swarm optimization and extreme learning machine BCIc.IV-2a (B), BCIc.III-3a (B) [136] Channel selection, FB in [8,32] Hz and in [6,30] Hz BCIc.IV-2a (M) [121] convolutional layers were mostly exploited. Recurrent neural networks like the long short-term memory [121] and adversarial-based methods [31] were used as well. In the multi-class cases, the mean classification accuracy of most performing deep neural networks resulted equal to 85% with 4% uncertainty, while non-deep artificial neural networks did not result among the most performing ones.…”
Section: Csp Random Forestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, it should be noted that BI approaches are much more effective in multiclass classification than non-BI approaches. Typically, for deep approaches the raw EEG signal [31,32] or 2D or 3D arrays obtained by Fourier or wavelet transforms [33,107,122] were given as input. With a few exceptions [121,123], features were extracted by hand mainly for the other methods.…”
Section: Csp Random Forestmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…WithoutLossNet proves the effectiveness of the central loss function on the BCIIV2a and SMR-BCI datasets, and the central loss function can well compensate for the shortcomings of Softmax. The combination of the central loss function and Softmax classifier can take into account the relationship between the class and different classes at the same time, so that the same type of data converges to the feature center, and the distance between the feature centers between different classes expands [33,34]. SingleScaleNet replaces different scale convolution kernels with 3x3 convolution kernels, which verifies that the features extracted from different scales of sensory fields are diverse, and the feature representations learned by multi-scale are more comprehensive and diverse.…”
Section: Ablation Experiments Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%