2022
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2161783/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Subject-independent EEG classification of motor imagery based on a dual-branch feature fusion

Abstract: Background: Brain-computer interface (BCI) system helps people with motor dysfunction interact with external environment. With the advancement of technology, the BCI system has been applied in practice, but its practicability and usability are still greatly challenged. A large amount of calibration time is often required before BCI systems are used, which can consume the patient’s energy and patience and can easily lead to anxiety. We propose a subject-independentzero calibration approach to solve this problem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MSAENet [35]: The authors suggest a dual-branch multiscale autoencoder network (MSAENet), which starts by building a network with a multiscale branch and an autoencoder (AE) for feature learning from various perspectives. Second, the covariance between the EEG signal and the common spatial pattern was employed as spatio-spectral features, and MSAENet's input is the feature-pre-extracted data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MSAENet [35]: The authors suggest a dual-branch multiscale autoencoder network (MSAENet), which starts by building a network with a multiscale branch and an autoencoder (AE) for feature learning from various perspectives. Second, the covariance between the EEG signal and the common spatial pattern was employed as spatio-spectral features, and MSAENet's input is the feature-pre-extracted data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these models can be quite accurate, they require ongoing calibration for each new user, leading to resource-intensive implementations [15], [16]. The second approach focuses on subject-independent models, aiming to identify features that are consistent across different individuals to avoid the need for calibration [17], [18]. While this approach is less resource-intensive, it often results in compromised performance [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%