2019
DOI: 10.1109/ted.2019.2936515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Low Turn-Off Loss and Snapback-Free Reverse-Conducting SOI-LIGBT With Integrated Polysilicon Diodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the tradeoff relationship between forward voltage drop (Von) and turn-off loss (Eoff) limits the development of LIGBTs [5][6][7][8][9]. To address this issue, the shorted anode (SA) LIGBT is proposed to reduce the Eoff by providing an additional electron extraction path of the N+ anode [10][11][12][13]. However, several drawbacks, especially an undesirable snapback phenomenon and high forward voltage drop (Von) are induced by the short effect of the N+ anode, which can prevent the device from full turnon and induce large conducting energy loss, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, the tradeoff relationship between forward voltage drop (Von) and turn-off loss (Eoff) limits the development of LIGBTs [5][6][7][8][9]. To address this issue, the shorted anode (SA) LIGBT is proposed to reduce the Eoff by providing an additional electron extraction path of the N+ anode [10][11][12][13]. However, several drawbacks, especially an undesirable snapback phenomenon and high forward voltage drop (Von) are induced by the short effect of the N+ anode, which can prevent the device from full turnon and induce large conducting energy loss, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several drawbacks, especially an undesirable snapback phenomenon and high forward voltage drop (Von) are induced by the short effect of the N+ anode, which can prevent the device from full turnon and induce large conducting energy loss, respectively. [13][14][15]. Many advanced structures have been proposed to solve these issues in recent years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to avoid voltage snapback and keep the advantage of SA structure, the high fixed anode resistance can be obtained by extending or compressing the electron flowing path, which ensures the normal hole injection process. For example, the further proposed separated shorted-anode (SSA) structure [16,17,18,19,20], and the trench barriers and shorted anode (TBSA) structure [21,22] realize the suppression of voltage snapback phenomenon, but also brings higher drift resistance and larger chip area. After that, the NPN controlled anode (SA NPN) structure [23,24,25], and the trench/planar gate and integrated Schottky barrier diode (TP-SBD) structure [26,27] have achieved completely snapback-free ability by introducing extra fixed turn-on voltage for SA structure, but it also leads to the weakening of the conductivity modulation ability of the device.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with unipolar devices, both the electrons and holes of LIGBT are involved in conduction in the onstate, which leads to a relatively lower forward conduction voltage drop (VON), but also leads to a long tail of turn-off current resulting in a high turn-off loss (EOFF) when the excess carriers can only disappear through recombination [9,10,11,12,13]. The turn-off loss can be reduced by reducing the hole injection efficiency of P+ anode, but this will also reduce the conductivity modulation effect and increase VON, so it is difficult to take both into account [14,15,16,17]. A better tradeoff can be achieved by changing the internal structure of the device, such as adding additional NPN electron extraction channels during turnoff [18,19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%