2013
DOI: 10.1134/s1023193513100078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel and low cost electrochemical sensor for ceftazidime and cefazoline as antibiotic drugs based on nickel/SDS-poly(o-aminophenol) modified electrode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Till date, this is the broadest linear calibration range for CFZ determination by electrochemical method. Detection limit and linear calibration of the proposed sensor together with previously published literature is tabulated in Table . From table 1 it is clear that the analytical performance of the prepared sensor is comparable with previously reported literature.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Till date, this is the broadest linear calibration range for CFZ determination by electrochemical method. Detection limit and linear calibration of the proposed sensor together with previously published literature is tabulated in Table . From table 1 it is clear that the analytical performance of the prepared sensor is comparable with previously reported literature.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The limit of detection (LOD) was calculated as recommended by Miller and Miller (using 3s of the blank signal) 49 and was found to be 2.5 Â 10 À8 mol L À1 . The LOD of the method was acceptable as compared to that of the previously reported spectrophotometric (LOD, 4 Â 10 À8 mol L À1 ), 4 HPLC (LOD, 4.3 Â 10 À7 mol L À1 ), 6 uorimetric (LOD, 1 Â 10 À8 mol L À1 ), 9 electrochemical (LOD, 1.8 Â 10 À6 mol L À1 ), 10 and chemiluminometric (LOD, 2 Â 10 À8 mol L À1 ) 11 methods. The relative standard deviation of the method was calculated upon four replicate determinations of 2.5 Â 10 À7 mol L À1 CFZM and was equal to 4.5% which shows satisfactory precision of the method.…”
Section: Analytical Characteristics Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…It is mainly eliminated from the consumers' body through renal excretion. 1,2 CFZM has been analyzed in pure form, various pharmaceutical dosage forms, and in biouids taking advantage of different analytical methods including spectrophotometry, 3,4 highperformance liquid chromatography (HPLC), 5,6 high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC), 7 liquid chromatographymass spectrometry (LC-MS), 8 uorescence spectrometry, 9 electrochemical sensors, 10 and chemiluminometry. 11 The above mentioned methods share one or more drawbacks such as low sensitivity, narrow linear working range, expensive and sophisticated instrumentation, employing complicated mathematical operations, using toxic and environmentally hazardous substances, and needing time-consuming and laborious procedures for sample preparation and analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%