2022
DOI: 10.1002/cta.3339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel adaptive H‐infinity filtering method for the accurate SOC estimation of lithium‐ion batteries based on optimal forgetting factor selection

Abstract: Accurate estimation of the state of charge (SOC) of lithium‐ion batteries is quite crucial to battery safety monitoring and efficient use of energy; to improve the accuracy of lithium‐ion battery SOC estimation under complicated working conditions, the research object of this study is the ternary lithium‐ion battery; the forgetting factor recursive least square (FFRLS) method optimized by particle swarm optimization (PSO) and adaptive H‐infinity filter (HIF) algorithm are adopted to estimate battery SOC. The P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To further verify the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm, three advanced algorithms are selected for comparison with the proposed algorithm. The algorithms compared in this section are AEKF [43], MIEKF [44] and AHIF [45] algorithms. For a fairly comparison, the proposed AFSFFRLS algorithm was used for each algorithm's parameter identification method and run 20 times independently, and the comparison is From Table 5, it can be seen that the proposed algorithm DEEKF has the best performance in terms of metrics for the three operating conditions, and the obtained MAE and RMSE values are the smallest.…”
Section: Experimental Results Of Soc In Different Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further verify the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm, three advanced algorithms are selected for comparison with the proposed algorithm. The algorithms compared in this section are AEKF [43], MIEKF [44] and AHIF [45] algorithms. For a fairly comparison, the proposed AFSFFRLS algorithm was used for each algorithm's parameter identification method and run 20 times independently, and the comparison is From Table 5, it can be seen that the proposed algorithm DEEKF has the best performance in terms of metrics for the three operating conditions, and the obtained MAE and RMSE values are the smallest.…”
Section: Experimental Results Of Soc In Different Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CKF was proposed by Arasaratnam et al in 2009, which is derivative-free and is regarded as an optimal approximation to the Bayesian filter that could be designed in a nonlinear system [29]. In this work, the MI-CKF is used to perform state estimation.…”
Section: International Journal Of Energy Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This confirms the analysis based on voltage estimation error, and the discharge OCV is more suitable for establishing LIC model and further SOC estimation. Figure 9 depicts the comparison results between the proposed MIF method and four commonly used algorithms for SOC estimation, including the EKF [30], the H infinity filter (HIF) [29], the CKF [31], and the square-root cubature Kalman filter (SRCKF) [32], where for such algorithms, the parameters are obtained with FFRLS. In addition, the statistical results of estimation error are listed in Table 4.…”
Section: Parameter Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…here, b is a fading factor, which is set to 0.96 [31]. Thanks to fading factor, the effect of the last collected data on the noise statistics estimator is increased [32].…”
Section: Time-varying Noise Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ez,k$$ {e}_{z,k} $$ is innovation value which is the difference between observation and estimation made by robot at time k$$ k $$. dk$$ {d}_k $$ is weighting coefficient, which is calculated as dk=1b1bk;$$ {d}_k=\frac{1-b}{1-{b}^k}; $$ here, b$$ b $$ is a fading factor, which is set to 0.96 [31]. Thanks to fading factor, the effect of the last collected data on the noise statistics estimator is increased [32].…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%