2014
DOI: 10.1117/12.2055721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new technique of characterization of the intrapixel response of astronomical detectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note, however, that the measured pixel response variations inside the pixel active area may not necessarily be silicon related, but could be due to microlens imperfections. In many of the prior studies ( [6], [7], [8], [9]), the IPS variation is extracted by the deconvolution method. We therefore compare our forward modeling method with the deconvolution method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note, however, that the measured pixel response variations inside the pixel active area may not necessarily be silicon related, but could be due to microlens imperfections. In many of the prior studies ( [6], [7], [8], [9]), the IPS variation is extracted by the deconvolution method. We therefore compare our forward modeling method with the deconvolution method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [4], Bryson et al reported a study of the Kepler pixel response function. [6] presents a new Continuous Self-Imaging Grating (CSIG) technique to measure the IPS map of the CCD in the framework of Euclid mission. Most prior publications studied extensively the IPS variation profiles of front and back illuminated CCDs [7], [8], [9], [10], but so far, few studies have been done on CMOS image sensors [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed description of the test bench has been presented in a precedent paper. 1 In this section we will describe the principal characteristics of the components, and the principle of the inversion software.…”
Section: General Description Of the Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This interferogram, as a self-image of the CSIG, is designed to explore the pixel's EUCLID CCD (pitch 12 µm) MTF to 500 mm −1 , which corresponds to explore the pixel response with an accuracy of 1 µm (or a twelfth of pixel). 1 Nevertheless, the pixel pitch under-samples the interferogram, cutting the MTF to a spatial frequency of 83 mm −1 , it is then necessary to microscan the CSIG to over-sample the interferogram. This microscan step consists in moving the CSIG at a pitch of 1 µm to ensure that a pixel -or a restrained zone of pixels on the detector -observes a complete period of the interferogram.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To mitigate the speed issue, a team located at CEA Saclay is currently developing a different calibration technique using spot arrays (Ketchazo et al 2014) generated by self imaging gratings (Guérineau et al 2001). The goals for the calibration are more general than precision astrometry, it includes for example photometry of diffuse objects.…”
Section: Detector Interferometric Calibration Experiments (Dice)mentioning
confidence: 99%