2016
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4117.2.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new species of Trichomycterus (Siluriformes: Trichomycteridae) from the upper río Magdalena basin, Colombia

Abstract: Trichomycterus tetuanensis, new species, is described from the río Tetuan, upper río Magdalena basin in Colombia. The new species is distinguished by its margin of caudal fin conspicuously emarginate, in combination with a high number of opercular odontodes (21-39), reflected externally in the large size of the opercular patch of odontodes, 3 irregular rows of conic teeth in the upper jaw, 42-52 interopercular odontodes, 8 branchiostegal rays, 37 post Weberian vertebrae, 7 branched pectoral-fin rays, hypural 3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, the genus contains over 170 species [6], however, its known diversity remains increasing along the recent years. Even with these obstacles, species groups within Trichomycterus were defined based on morphological characteristics [11,25,26,27,28,29,30,31], some of them constantly redefined and re-diagnosed, such as the Trichomycterus brasiliensis species complex [14,32,33], which, to date, its monophyly could not be consistently assessed [34]. Besides, these characters and all species included on these groups were not placed into a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis, therefore with the possibility of representing artificial groups due to possible parallelisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the genus contains over 170 species [6], however, its known diversity remains increasing along the recent years. Even with these obstacles, species groups within Trichomycterus were defined based on morphological characteristics [11,25,26,27,28,29,30,31], some of them constantly redefined and re-diagnosed, such as the Trichomycterus brasiliensis species complex [14,32,33], which, to date, its monophyly could not be consistently assessed [34]. Besides, these characters and all species included on these groups were not placed into a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis, therefore with the possibility of representing artificial groups due to possible parallelisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trichomycterus lauryi is distinguished from all congeners, with the exception of T. argos Lezama et al , , T. dispar , T. gironensis Ardila Rodríguez, , T. hualco Fernández & Vari, , T. manaurensis Ardila Rodríguez, , T. megantoni Fernández & Chuquihuamaní, 2007, T. punctulatus , T. rubiginosus Barbosa & Costa, , T. tetuanensis García‐Melo et al , and T. therma Fernández & Miranda, , by its outer layer of coloration composed of scattered, round, black or dark‐brown spots, smaller or equivalent in size to the circumference of the eye (Figures and ; vs . round spots absent or, if present, either noticeably larger than the circumference of the eye or arranged in longitudinal rows).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All species examined and incorporated in the molecular analysis (voucher specimens) were identified or validated by comparing with type specimens, original descriptions (i.e., Ardila Rodríguez, 2016, 2018; Barbosa & Costa, 2010;Fernandez & Chuquihuamaní, 2007;Fernández & Miranda, 2007;Fernández & Vari, 2009;García-Melo et al, 2016;Lezama et al, 2012) and other works with informative data (i.e., Bizerril, 1994;Datovo et al, 2012;Donin, 2019;Eigenmann, 1918;Ferrer & Malabarba, 2011Nascimento et al, 2017;Terán et al, 2017;Wosiacki, 2005;Wosiacki & Garavello, 2004;Wosiacki & Oyakawa, 2005), except for the genetic sequences available in GenBank obtained by Nascimento et al (2017)***, Ochoa et al (2017aOchoa et al ( , 2017b)* and Pereira et al (2011)**. In these cases, the taxonomic identifications provided by the respective author(s) were adopted and their authorship along the text and in the phylogenetic tree was annotated using asterisks (see earlier).…”
Section: Samples and Comparative Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3, p. 36; T. striatus (Meek & Hildebrand 1913) in Angulo et al ., : fig. 4, p. 536; T. tetuanensis García‐Melo, Villa‐Navarro & DoNascimiento 2016 in García‐Melo et al ., : fig. 5, p. 232; T. uisae in Castellanos‐Morales, : fig.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified