IEEE Africon '11 2011
DOI: 10.1109/afrcon.2011.6072078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new PI tuning rule for first order plus dead-time systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the infinite number of poles in s-domain, caused by time delay, can be transformed into the finite number of poles in z-domain by taking advantage of discretetime domain representation. Since no approximation is used for the time delay term, stability analysis and controller design is done easily [5].…”
Section: B Discrete Pid Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the infinite number of poles in s-domain, caused by time delay, can be transformed into the finite number of poles in z-domain by taking advantage of discretetime domain representation. Since no approximation is used for the time delay term, stability analysis and controller design is done easily [5].…”
Section: B Discrete Pid Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A discrete PID controller structure is given in (5). It is clear from the discrete PID controller transfer function that there are two controller poles at the locations of = 0 and = 1.…”
Section: B Discrete Pid Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these higher-order models are very precise, for control purposes, they are not to be used. In majority of cases, a linear first-order system with dead time element representation is used to model the behavior of the higher-order models (Eris & Kurtulan, 2011;Kurtulan & Goren, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can compensate the effect of both the delayed and non-delayed processes. It is important to note that the cost benefit ratio achieved through the PID controller is not easy to achieve with other controllers (Eris & Kurtulan, 2011;Gopi Krishna Rao, Subramanyam, & Satyaprasad, 2013;Lee et al, 2008;Pai et al, 2010;Shamsuzzoha & Lee, 2008a). An observation indicates, 97% of the regulatory controllers use a PID algorithm (Desborough & Miller, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PID can compensate the effects of processes with delay and no delay. A study has indicated that 97 % of the controllers in the industry use PID algorithm for regulator operation (Lee et al 2008;Pai et al 2010;Eris and Kurtulan 2011;Gopi Krishna Rao et al 2013;Desborough and Miller 2002). The IFAC Conference on Advances in PID Control held in Brescia (Italy) during 28-30 March 2012 concluded that there is no perfect alternative to the PID controller at least at the bottom layer in the process industries (Alcántara et al 2013;Shamsuzzoha 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%