2017
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/aa673d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new micromechanical approach for the preparation of graphene nanoplatelets deposited on polyethylene

Abstract: An advantageous micromechanical technique to deposit large area graphene nanoplatelet (GNP) thin films on a low-density polyethylene substrate is proposed. This method is based on the application of shear-stress and friction forces to a graphite platelets/ethanol paste on the surface of a polymeric substrate; it allows us to obtain a continuous film of superimposed nanoplatelets mainly made of 13-30 graphene layers. X-ray diffraction (XRD), atomic force and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) measurements s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To counteract this disruption, Arapov et al used compression rolling to improve the structural integrity of the prints, as well as provide further improvements to resistivity, down to 20 X h -1 , along with a reduction in film thickness and surface roughness from 6 lm and 0.945 lm, respectively, after thermal drying to 1.7 lm and 0.065 lm, respectively, after photonic annealing followed by compression rolling [26]. Compression rolling alone has also been investigated as a possible postprocessing method for a range of applications including radio frequency identification (RFID) antenna and other graphene-based prints and coatings, which in these cases were binder-free, where it produced improvements in the electrical and thermal conductivity of the devices due to better flake alignment [26][27][28][29]. There are also reports of compression rolling leading to improvements in the electrochemical performance of screen-printed lithium-ion batteries with electrodes consisting of graphite [30][31][32] and amorphous carbon [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To counteract this disruption, Arapov et al used compression rolling to improve the structural integrity of the prints, as well as provide further improvements to resistivity, down to 20 X h -1 , along with a reduction in film thickness and surface roughness from 6 lm and 0.945 lm, respectively, after thermal drying to 1.7 lm and 0.065 lm, respectively, after photonic annealing followed by compression rolling [26]. Compression rolling alone has also been investigated as a possible postprocessing method for a range of applications including radio frequency identification (RFID) antenna and other graphene-based prints and coatings, which in these cases were binder-free, where it produced improvements in the electrical and thermal conductivity of the devices due to better flake alignment [26][27][28][29]. There are also reports of compression rolling leading to improvements in the electrochemical performance of screen-printed lithium-ion batteries with electrodes consisting of graphite [30][31][32] and amorphous carbon [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the surfaces of polymers such as poly (methyl methacrylate), polyethylene terephthalate and low-density polyethylene (LDPE) have been made conductive by depositing graphite or graphene layers onto them for the fabrication of printed radio frequency devices [18], electrically conductive paths [19], piezoresistive sensors [20], and strain gauges [9]. These layers can be deposited by chemical vapor deposition [21], casting and drying inks [18], micromechanical techniques based on spreading an alcoholic suspension of graphite nanoplatelets [22,23] and spraying conductive composites [9]. In particular, this last technique is easy, inexpensive, and industrially scalable for the fabrication of large area films.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S25 and S26, ESI † ). 35 The inter-layer distance was obtained by Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) of the layered regions evidenced in the insets, providing value of 10.2 ± 0.2 Å, Fig. 4b ( vide infra ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%