2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-019-03462-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of photonic flash annealing with subsequent compression rolling on the topography, microstructure and electrical performance of carbon-based inks

Abstract: Binders used in screen-printed carbon-based inks are typically non-conductive. Photonic annealing and subsequent compression rolling have therefore been employed to remove binder and consolidate the conductive particles. Using this method, screen-printable carbon inks containing graphite only, graphite nanoplatelets and a combination of graphite and carbon black were assessed. Photonic annealing leads to the degradation of the polymer binder separating the carbon morphologies, with subsequent compression rolli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(49 reference statements)
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Irrespective of plasma functionalization, the coatings show low surface roughness, < 800 nm, at all phase volumes. At < 800 lm, the surface roughness of the GNP inks is significantly lower than that of the 2.8 lm found for a 22.5 wt% graphite ink used by Potts et al 4 and shows good agreement with the 800 nm found for oxygen plasma functionalized GNPs used in the same study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Irrespective of plasma functionalization, the coatings show low surface roughness, < 800 nm, at all phase volumes. At < 800 lm, the surface roughness of the GNP inks is significantly lower than that of the 2.8 lm found for a 22.5 wt% graphite ink used by Potts et al 4 and shows good agreement with the 800 nm found for oxygen plasma functionalized GNPs used in the same study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…1 Advantages of carbon inks include their relatively low cost, disposability, ease of use, chemical inertness, the ability to be modified or functionalized and their controllable electronic properties. [2][3][4][5] Dispersion of nano-fillers is a key issue in governing the properties of composites. 6,7 However, achieving good dispersion of nano-carbons within a fluid has proved difficult as a result of the inert, hydrophobic, ultra-high interfacial area per volume and highly agglomerated nature of carbon nanomaterials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a wide particle size distribution of the GNPs with platelet diameter ranging from » 1 to 8 lm. The platelets have generally fallen flat to form a paved type structure; however, within this structure are large gaps where the high-aspect-ratio platelets are unable to pack efficiently, with GNPs at various angles relative to the substrate in good agreement to the work on GNPbased inks by Potts et al 27 and the work on graphite composites by Kasgoz et al 19 The thickness of these platelets can be estimated to be » 0.75-100 nm from the platelets which have not fallen flat and whose edges are visible. Three roll milling appears to be an effective technique for initial dispersion of GNPs in a low-viscosity resin system, and as indicated by the absence of any large agglomerates, the dispersion is initially stable over the 24-h period between dispersion and coating.…”
Section: Particle Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…These peaks can lead to increases in print roughness and reductions in print homogeneity. Whereas the 10 wt.% ink which did not form any filaments during ink separation had a far more consistent print profile with only small areas of high film thickness, most likely due to the random orientation of the graphite flakes in the ink, as seen in previous studies [10,37].…”
Section: Ink Separation Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Figure 8 identified that the locations of the filaments during separation led to notable raised areas on the printed film which increased the surface roughness, while the average surface roughness was unaffected. This is most likely due to the random orientation of the large graphite flakes in the ink determining this, with flakes measuring up to tens of microns, as quantified in previous studies [10,37]. Therefore, this separation mechanism may have a more significant effects on inks with contain smaller particles or which recover to their initial viscosity in a shorter time period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%