1998
DOI: 10.1109/20.706600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new method of calculating the medium field and the demagnetizing field for MR heads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Output signals were calculated by using a recorded magnetization pattern and a sensitivity function. 27,28) The recorded magnetization pattern was calculated by using the LLG equation; namely, magnetic dots were assumed to be saturated and relaxed. A model of an MR head for calculating the sensitivity function (magnetic field) is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Methods For Calculating Snrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Output signals were calculated by using a recorded magnetization pattern and a sensitivity function. 27,28) The recorded magnetization pattern was calculated by using the LLG equation; namely, magnetic dots were assumed to be saturated and relaxed. A model of an MR head for calculating the sensitivity function (magnetic field) is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Methods For Calculating Snrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This field is usually calculated by 2D models limited to ideal shields having infinite permeability (Yuan and Bertram, 1993). For 3D heads with arbitrar permeability, large‐scale finite element method (FEM) computation could be used (Suzuki and Ishikawa, 1998). Because the MR reading heads for disk/tape drives discussed here are systems with very different dimensions, the BEM seems the most adapted.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large discrepancy in characteristic length scales of the various head elements results in complex computational issues. Indeed, the medium field is usually calculated by bi-dimensional (2D) models limited to shields with infinite permeability [1][2][3] or by large scale finite element method (FEM) computation with arbitrary permeability (2D/finite 3D) [4]. Inversely, the sensor response has to be described in a micromagnetic approach which is impossible to implement above the micron-scale to limit computation time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%