1991
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)76899-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Method for Documenting Lens Opacities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using our method, the coefficient of variation for repeated analyses of the same image (1%) is in agreement with that obtained by other similar methods (2.3%) [18]. A comparison of the reproducibility of different images between our method and that of others is not possible because, in the literature, various methods were used to determine the reproducibility and no individual measurements were given.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Using our method, the coefficient of variation for repeated analyses of the same image (1%) is in agreement with that obtained by other similar methods (2.3%) [18]. A comparison of the reproducibility of different images between our method and that of others is not possible because, in the literature, various methods were used to determine the reproducibility and no individual measurements were given.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The objectives of our study were (1) to compare the clinical assessment of the level of nuclear opacity and the results of densitomet- ric analysis of the lens and (2) to define the most clinically relevant features among the various measurements obtained from the densitometric analysis.…”
Section: Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various equipments for photodocumentation of cataract changes and systems for clinical grading of lens opacities have been proposed for epidemiological studies [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Different features of computerised analysis of Scheimpflug slit images can be chosen to indicate a level of lens opacification or progression of cataract [4,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flash level was 100 Watt-seconds and the slit length was 4.4 mm. The area of the opacity, in pixels, was analyzed using an EAS-1000 (34,35). The outline of the slit lens image was determined by selecting 4 points on the image.…”
Section: Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%