2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new Late Holocene sea-level record from the Mississippi Delta: evidence for a climate/sea level connection?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
64
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3). Salt-marsh proxy records from the Gulf of Mexico (17,18) show stable sea level until AD 1000, followed by rise to a peak at AD 1200. In Connecticut, sea level rose rapidly at AD 1000 (19), although this record may be compromised by sedimentary hiatuses from hurricane erosion (20,21).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). Salt-marsh proxy records from the Gulf of Mexico (17,18) show stable sea level until AD 1000, followed by rise to a peak at AD 1200. In Connecticut, sea level rose rapidly at AD 1000 (19), although this record may be compromised by sedimentary hiatuses from hurricane erosion (20,21).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salt-marsh proxy records from the Gulf of Mexico (17,18) show stable sea level until AD 1000, followed by rise to a peak at AD 1200. In Connecticut, sea-level rose rapidly at AD 1000 (19), although this record maybe compromised by sedimentary hiatuses from hurricane erosion (20,21). In Iceland, sea level fell gradually from AD 500 to 1800, possibly as a result of regional steric influences (22).…”
Section: Comparison With Other Proxy Sea-level Reconstructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other published studies of late Holocene sea-level change were adjusted for rates of glacio-isostatic adjustment (GIA) using estimates presented in the original publication (Maine (17), Nova Scotia (17, 18), Louisiana (19), Iceland (20), Israel (21)), Italy (22) and the Cook Islands (23)), or from (24) in the cases of Spain and New Zealand. No GIA correction was applied to the Israel data because the original publication states that the net effect was zero (21) because the rate of land subsidence was offset by ocean basin subsidence.…”
Section: Gia However the Location Of A Sea-level Reconstruction (Nementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Datasets which cover the 81 last 700 and 1500 years in Connecticut, USA (Donnelly et al, 2004;van de Plassche, 2000 82 respectively) and AD 600-1600 in Louisiana (González and Törnqvist, 2009) provide snapshots of past 83 RSL, but it is difficult to clearly identify periods of past sea-level change from such short records. It 84 has been suggested that the regionally variable signals along the USA-Canadian margin during the 85 late Holocene may, in part, be due to changes in the strength and position of the Gulf Stream 86 (Fairbridge, 1992;Fletcher et al, 1993;Gehrels et al, 2002), in a similar way to sea-level changes 87 recorded by tide gauges over the last 50 years (Kopp, 2013;Sallenger et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introduction 33mentioning
confidence: 99%