2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2004.tb01046.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A NEW FLASHINESS INDEX: CHARACTERISTICS AND APPLICATIONS TO MIDWESTERN RIVERS AND STREAMS1

Abstract: The term flashiness reflects the frequency and rapidity of short term changes in streamflow, especially during runoff events. Flashiness is an important component of a stream's hydrologic regime. A variety of land use and land management changes may lead to increased or decreased flashiness, often to the detriment of aquatic life. This paper presents a newly developed flashiness index, which is based on mean daily flows. The index is calculated by dividing the pathlength of flow oscillations for a time interva… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
467
0
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 503 publications
(491 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
16
467
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…El estudio de la magnitud y frecuencia se realiza a partir de i) la media de los máximos caudales diarios anuales (Q C ) y, si se dispone, de la media de los caudales máximos instantáneos anuales (Q Ci ), ii) el caudal bankfull (Q Bank ) y, iii) el caudal máximo ordinario o caudal de crecida (Q 5 ) correspondiente al percentil 5 (por ej. Clausen y Biggs, 2000;Baker et al, 2004;Batalla et al, 2004), tomado de una curva de caudales clasificados. Para el cálculo del caudal bankfull (Q Bank ) se ha seguido el cálculo propuesto por Villarroya y Xuclá (2003): Para el estudio de la variabilidad, tanto para las variables que se incluyen en el RNC y en el RMC, se ha utilizado el coeficiente de variación de los Q c y el de los Q 5 .…”
Section: Régimen Hidrológico Y De Crecidasunclassified
“…El estudio de la magnitud y frecuencia se realiza a partir de i) la media de los máximos caudales diarios anuales (Q C ) y, si se dispone, de la media de los caudales máximos instantáneos anuales (Q Ci ), ii) el caudal bankfull (Q Bank ) y, iii) el caudal máximo ordinario o caudal de crecida (Q 5 ) correspondiente al percentil 5 (por ej. Clausen y Biggs, 2000;Baker et al, 2004;Batalla et al, 2004), tomado de una curva de caudales clasificados. Para el cálculo del caudal bankfull (Q Bank ) se ha seguido el cálculo propuesto por Villarroya y Xuclá (2003): Para el estudio de la variabilidad, tanto para las variables que se incluyen en el RNC y en el RMC, se ha utilizado el coeficiente de variación de los Q c y el de los Q 5 .…”
Section: Régimen Hidrológico Y De Crecidasunclassified
“…5). Similarly, studies of the "flashiness" (sensu Baker et al, 2007) of the runoff behaviour of urbanized and forested catchments in Puerto Rico revealed no differences (Ramírez et al, 2009;Phillips and Scatena, 2010). However, Phillips and Scatena (2010) did detect significant differences (p < 0.05) in the frequency of stage change (cf.…”
Section: Impacts Of Land-cover Change On Streamflowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rate of change provides an indication of how a stream responds to a rainfall event (slowly or rapidly) and how long discharge from that event might be realized. While different from flashiness, rate of change indices, such as time to peak discharge and time to recession, also provide some insight into stream flashiness (Baker et al, 2004). Sixteen hydrology indices representing a subset of the hydrological indices recommended by Olden & Poff (2002) were selected for this study to enable characterization of the magnitude, frequency, timing and rate of change of hydrology in channelized and natural headwater streams.…”
Section: Hydrological Indices and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Headwater streams tend to be more "flashy" than larger rivers (Baker et al, 2004). Channelization and tile drainage, characteristic of low-gradient midwestern USA streams, also affect the response of the stream to rainfall inputs and tend to produce "flashy" streams Schaller et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%