2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2008.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new approach to modeling early warning systems for currency crises: Can a machine-learning fuzzy expert system predict the currency crises effectively?

Abstract: This paper presents a hybrid causal model for predicting the occurrence of currency crises by using the neuro fuzzy modeling approach. The model integrates the learning ability of the neural network with the inference mechanism of fuzzy logic. The empirical results show that the proposed neuro fuzzy model leads to a better prediction of crisis. Significantly, the model can also construct a reliable causal relationship among the variables through the obtained knowledge base. Compared to neural network and the t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the KLR method are shown in Table 3. Table 3, it appears that the inflation has a noise-to-signal ratio less than 0.5 4 (Lin et al 2008) in all regimes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The results of the KLR method are shown in Table 3. Table 3, it appears that the inflation has a noise-to-signal ratio less than 0.5 4 (Lin et al 2008) in all regimes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…These include expert systems based on self-organising maps ( Jagric, Bojnec, & Jagric, 2015 ), neural network models ( Celik & Karatepe, 2007;Iturriaga & Sanz, 2015;Nag & Mitra, 1999;Sevim, Oztekin, Bali, Gumus, & Guresen, 2014 ), regression trees ( Manasse & Roubini, 2009 ), binary classification trees ( Duttagupta & Cashin, 2008 ), hybrid models ( Lin, Khan, Chang, & Wang, 2008;Lin, 2009 ), grey rational analysis ( Lin & Wu, 2011 ), support vector machines ( Ahn, Oh, Kim, & Kim, 2011;Feki, Ishak, & Feki, 2012 ), random forests ( Alessi & Detken, 2014 ), and the multiple-indicator-multiple-cause method ( Rose & Spiegel, 2012 ). Comparisons between such methods have been conducted by Boyacioglu, Kara, and Baykan (2009) .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppose there are C coupled HMMs, N is the number of hidden states, the elements of a CHMM are as follows [22]:…”
Section: Coupled Hidden Markov Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, different indicators often produce different prediction outcomes for financial crisis. To obtain a more stable prediction outcome, multiple indicators are used and combined for the signaling [22],…”
Section: B Baseline Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%