2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0927-0248(00)00274-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new approach to high-efficiency solar cells by band gap grading in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 chalcopyrite semiconductors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
106
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas the copper-poor stoichiometry of the absorber surface is well known for the Shell Solar absorbers 16,17 and for other optimized CIGSSe absorbers, [26][27][28] to our knowledge this was found only once before at the back side of a CuInSe 2 absorber 12 , probably due to the difficulty of preparing suitable samples as mentioned above.…”
Section: -3mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Whereas the copper-poor stoichiometry of the absorber surface is well known for the Shell Solar absorbers 16,17 and for other optimized CIGSSe absorbers, [26][27][28] to our knowledge this was found only once before at the back side of a CuInSe 2 absorber 12 , probably due to the difficulty of preparing suitable samples as mentioned above.…”
Section: -3mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…A decrease in recombination would normally be expected to produce an increase in FF and V oc . However, in the new device, the deposition was ended with a small amount of In, without Ga. V oc is determined by Ga content in the space-charge region (SCR), including that at the surface of the CIGS; 12,13 therefore, we hypothesize that the method of reducing recombination presented here is achieved at the price of a slightly lower bandgap in a portion of the SCR, and thus no V oc increase is achieved. Minimum bandgap, which is the main determinant of J sc , occurs about 0Á5 mm into the film and is unchanged by near-surface variations.…”
Section: Device Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15] The effect of this internal offset at the GBs could be of similar importance as it is at the surface of the absorber, 33 whereas, there is ample experimental evidence for the Cu-poor surface layer 34,35 and its beneficial consequences for the performance of CIGS solar cells as long as the overall film composition is Cu-poor, 36 the question whether or not such a Cu-poor layer is a general positive feature of GBs in CIGS is still under discussion. [37][38][39][40] The present study concentrates on investigating the effect of such an internal band offset and on finding the conditions that have to be fulfilled if the Cu-poor layer should have a decisive beneficial effect on the performance of polycrystalline CIGS solar cells.…”
Section: A Excess Barrier Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%