1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0309-1708(96)00017-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multistep constant-head borehole test to determine field saturated hydraulic conductivity of layered soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…How-ever, investigations examining the heterogeneity of the vadose zone are limited relative to the saturated zone by the fact that pumping and tracer tests, which depend on groundwater movement, are impossible. Those studies must utilize other methods, including particle size analysis (Nimmo et al, 2004;Dann et al, 2009), air permeability (Dixon and Nichols, 2005;Chief et al, 2008) and permeameter testing (Xiang et al, 1997;Reynolds, 2010;Miller et al, 2011). When the vadose zone is dominated by coarse gravel such efforts are made more difficult by the problems associated with sampling in gravel: large particles resist penetration by and clog samplers, excavated pits are prone to collapse, and high hydraulic conductivity rates require large volumes of water for in situ permeameter testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How-ever, investigations examining the heterogeneity of the vadose zone are limited relative to the saturated zone by the fact that pumping and tracer tests, which depend on groundwater movement, are impossible. Those studies must utilize other methods, including particle size analysis (Nimmo et al, 2004;Dann et al, 2009), air permeability (Dixon and Nichols, 2005;Chief et al, 2008) and permeameter testing (Xiang et al, 1997;Reynolds, 2010;Miller et al, 2011). When the vadose zone is dominated by coarse gravel such efforts are made more difficult by the problems associated with sampling in gravel: large particles resist penetration by and clog samplers, excavated pits are prone to collapse, and high hydraulic conductivity rates require large volumes of water for in situ permeameter testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variability can cause a problem of heterogeneity of response to irrigation or underground drainage [4]. However, the spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity can be used to analyse contamination in the unsaturated zone [15]. In this heterogeneous environment, the distribution of hydraulic conductivity obeys the log normal law [16] and hydraulic conductivity presents a strong random component [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, gamma and neutron logs of boreholes only provide information on the vertical distribution of soil stratigraphy and water-filled porosity (Hodges et al, 2012). Xiang et al (1997) presented a multistep (constant head) permeameter test to determine K s value for a layered soil using the LAYERK model. LAYERK is an analytic code that was designed to determine the field-saturated hydraulic conductivity and the matric flux potential for individual layers using input parameters including layer thickness, the water level in the borehole, the radius of the borehole, and flow rate.…”
Section: Deterministic Heterogeneity -Layered Soil Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have attempted to estimate the effective saturated hydraulic conductivity of an unsaturated soil using a constant head borehole test. For example, analytical solutions have been developed to determine the hydraulic properties of a homogenous soil domain using constant head data and numerical simulations have been conducted to evaluate the accuracy of these analytical solutions (Reynolds and Elrick, 1985;Xiang et al, 1997). However, estimates of the hydraulic conductivity were often unrealistic due to the assumption of soil homogeneity in these analytical solutions (Reynolds and Elrick, 1985) and inherent soil heterogeneity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation