2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2019.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multiplex RT-PCR assay for rapid and simultaneous detection of four RNA viruses in swine

Abstract: A B S T R A C TA multiplex reverse transcription polymerase chain rection (mRT-PCR) was developed for simultaneous detection of four RNA viruses in swine. The conserved target sequences directed to classical swine fever virus (CSFV), porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) and transmissible gastroenteritis coronavirus (TGEV) were selected based on alignments of genomic sequences and then specific primers were designed. The mRT-PCR assay was developed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The LOD of our multiplex real-time PCR detection method can reach as low as 1 × 10 2 copies/μL for each pathogen, while that of the singleplex conventional RT-PCR is generally around 1 × 10 3 copies/μL to 1 × 10 4 copies/μL [ 51 ]. Likewise, multiplex conventional RT-PCR shows no noticeable advantage in terms of sensitivity [ 34 , 52 ]. Hui et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The LOD of our multiplex real-time PCR detection method can reach as low as 1 × 10 2 copies/μL for each pathogen, while that of the singleplex conventional RT-PCR is generally around 1 × 10 3 copies/μL to 1 × 10 4 copies/μL [ 51 ]. Likewise, multiplex conventional RT-PCR shows no noticeable advantage in terms of sensitivity [ 34 , 52 ]. Hui et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…developed a multiplex RT-PCR detection for CSFV, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), PEDV, and TGEV. The limit of detection of this method was 1 × 10 3 copies/μL [ 52 ]. On the other hand, although multiplex real-time PCR combines high sensitivity and high detection efficiency, the design of qualified multiplex real-time PCR assays, especially of quadruplex quantitative real-time PCR assays, is challenging [ 48 , 49 , 53 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results indicated that samples with a minimum of 10 4 to 10 6 viral copies, depending on the sample type, can be successfully sequenced to accurately identify strains after about 6 hours of sequencing. Although DRS is not as sensitive as PCR for use as a diagnostic tool identifying viral presence [77,78], it can be used for further investigation of the strain causing an outbreak, either directly from high viral load samples or following amplification of virus in cell culture. Additionally, a very strong correlation was observed between the number of viral reads generated through sequencing and the starting number of viral copies, indicating sequencing reads can be predicted by viral copies in a sample and vice versa, which has been confirmed by other studies as well [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is quite useful and convenient for quick and accurate detection of different pathogens in mixed infections, which is common in swine production systems. Multiplex RT-PCR assays for rapid detection and genotyping of CSFVs [ 36 , 37 ], simultaneous detection, and differentiation of common swine viruses [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ] have been developed. Additionally, multiplex combined high-throughput molecular diagnostic platform, user-friendly electronic microarray, magnetoelastic sensor, and microfluidic detection systems were developed as potential alternatives for detection and surveillance of CSFV infection [ 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 ].…”
Section: Antigen Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%