2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multicentre randomised phase III trial comparing pembrolizumab versus single-agent chemotherapy for advanced pre-treated malignant pleural mesothelioma: the European Thoracic Oncology Platform (ETOP 9-15) PROMISE-meso trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
153
1
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
153
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In the malignant mesothelioma cohort of KEYNOTE-028, an objective response rate (ORR) of 20% and median response duration of 12 months were observed, similar to the ORR of 22% and median overall survival of 11.5 months in NCT02399371. However, the results of a randomized phase III trial (NCT02991482, PROMISE-meso) (11) found no difference in median PFS or OS (median OS of 10.7 months for pembrolizumab versus 11.7 months for gemcitabine or vinorelbine).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the malignant mesothelioma cohort of KEYNOTE-028, an objective response rate (ORR) of 20% and median response duration of 12 months were observed, similar to the ORR of 22% and median overall survival of 11.5 months in NCT02399371. However, the results of a randomized phase III trial (NCT02991482, PROMISE-meso) (11) found no difference in median PFS or OS (median OS of 10.7 months for pembrolizumab versus 11.7 months for gemcitabine or vinorelbine).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunotherapy data from randomized clinical trials are emerging. In the randomized Phase III PROMISE-meso trial in patients with MPM that progressed on or after platinum-based chemotherapy, pembrolizumab monotherapy significantly improved objective response rate but did not improve progression-free survival or OS compared with single agent chemotherapy [32]. However, CheckMate 743 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02899299), a Phase III clinical trial investigating nivolumab + ipilimumab versus pemetrexed + platinum as first-line SACT in patients with unresectable MPM, was recently reported to have met its primary end point of OS (median, 18.1 vs 14.1 months; hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI: 0.61-0.89; p = 0.002) [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Examples of ICIs used in the clinic include the CTLA‐4 inhibitors ipilimumab and tremelimumab, the PD‐1 inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab, and the PD‐L1 inhibitors durvalumab, avelumab, and atezolizumab. These ICIs have been investigated in several clinical trials for advanced mesothelioma as monotherapy (Table 1) 32‐39 and in combination therapies (see Table 2 40‐47 Table 3 48 ). On October 2, 2020, the FDA approved the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first‐line treatment for patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma 44…”
Section: Immunotherapy With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors As New Frontmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phase 3 PROMISE‐meso trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02991482) randomized 144 patients with advanced, pretreated mesothelioma to receive either pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks or physician's choice of salvage chemotherapy 47 . The ORR was 22% for the pembrolizumab group compared with 6% for the chemotherapy group.…”
Section: Immunotherapy With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors As New Frontmentioning
confidence: 99%