The bone marrow (BM) microenvironment of multiple myeloma (MM) is reported to play a role in the biology of disease. In this study, we found that the extracellular BM microenvironment in MM contains a unique miRNA signature detectable by miRNA microarray and quantitative real-time PCR, which is partially represented in the peripheral blood. Eleven miRNAs were significantly decreased in both BM and serum of MM patients in comparison with controls. Evaluation of these miRNAs in plasma of a separate cohort of MM patients and controls confirmed significantly aberrant levels of let-7a, let-7b, let-7i, miR15b, miR-16, and miR-20a in both serum and plasma. We then studied the myeloma precursor diseases and found that a subset of the MM miRNAs exhibited aberrant expression in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smoldering myeloma. miRNA analysis of enriched CD138 þ plasma cells from MM and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance found that most of the validated MM BM signature miRNAs were significantly decreased in MM plasma cells. Gene expression profiling indicated that multiple targets of the decreased miRNAs found increased expression in MM plasma cells, including ATF2, HRAS, HDAC4, TGFB1, TGFBR1, and mitogen-activated protein kinases. The findings suggest that these miRNAs are detectable in aberrant levels in the peripheral blood of patients with plasma cell proliferation and may play a role in aberrant plasma cell proliferation and disease progression. Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant plasma cell (PC) neoplasm that evolves from an underlying asymptomatic precursor clonal PC proliferation designated monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). MGUS is present in >3% of the population aged >50 years and progresses to myeloma at a rate of nearly 1% per year. 1Smoldering myeloma (SMM) represents an intermediate entity with increased bone marrow (BM) clonal PCs without symptomatic disease and carries an increased rate of progression to myeloma of nearly 10% per year.2 Currently, no single factor can predict patients with MGUS that are likely to progress to MM. A biomarker of disease progression in the peripheral blood (PB) could assist in the early identification of patients evolving to MM. Recent data suggest that serum miRNAs are altered in MM and MGUS and may serve as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. 3,4 miRNAs use a post-transcriptional gene regulation mechanism that was shown to play a role in development, differentiation, and tumorigenesis. 5e7 miRNAs are evolutionarily conserved small non-coding RNAs, which regulate gene

LMB-100 is an immunotoxin targeting the cell surface protein mesothelin, which is highly expressed in many cancers including mesothelioma. Having observed that patients receiving pembrolizumab off protocol after LMB-100 treatment had increased tumor responses; we characterized these responses and developed animal models to study whether LMB-100 made tumors more responsive to antibodies blocking programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1). The overall objective tumor response in the 10 patients who received PD-1 inhibitor (pembrolizumab, 9; nivolumab, 1) after progression on LMB-100 was 40%, and the median overall survival was 11.9 months. Of the seven evaluable patients, four had objective tumor responses, including one complete response and three partial responses, and the overall survival for these patients was 39.0+, 27.7, 32.6+, and 13.8 months. When stratified with regard to programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, four of five patients with tumor PD-L1 expression had objective tumor response. Patients with positive tumor PD-L1 expression also had increased progression-free survival (11.3 versus 2.1 months, P = 0.0018) compared with those lacking PD-L1 expression. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (27.7 versus 6.8 months, P = 0.1). LMB-100 caused a systemic inflammatory response and recruitment of CD8+ T cells in patients’ tumors. The enhanced antitumor effects with LMB-100 plus anti–PD-1 antibody were also observed in a human peripheral blood mononuclear cell–engrafted mesothelioma mouse model and a human mesothelin–expressing syngeneic lung adenocarcinoma mouse model. LMB-100 plus pembrolizumab is now being evaluated in a prospective clinical trial for patients with mesothelioma.

Malignant mesothelioma is an aggressive cancer with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. For many years, the only US Food and Drug Administration‐approved first‐line treatment for unresectable mesothelioma was pemetrexed plus cisplatin. However, the recent approval of nivolumab plus ipilimumab as frontline treatment for patients with pleural mesothelioma marks a significant milestone for the treatment of this disease. In this review, the authors describe recent advances in therapeutic strategies for the treatment of patients with advanced, unresectable mesothelioma, highlighting the emerging use of immunotherapy and mesothelin‐targeted therapies for the management of malignant mesothelioma.

Introduction: PARP inhibition may enhance antitumor responses in BAP1-associated mesothelioma by inducing synthetic lethality.Methods: A single-center, nonrandomized, phase 2 trial was conducted, in which patients with refractory mesothelioma were given olaparib 300 mg twice daily in a 21-day cycle until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary objective was to determine the objective response rate on the basis of somatic or germline mutation status of DNA repair genes. The secondary objectives were to assess safety and tolerability and to determine progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Whole-exome sequencing was performed on blood and tumor.Results: A total of 23 previously treated patients with pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma were enrolled and treated (germline BAP1, n ¼ 4; germline MRE11A, n ¼ 1; somatic BAP1, n ¼ 8 mutations). There was one (4%) partial response, 18 (78%) with stable disease at 6 weeks, and four (17%) with progressive disease. The median overall PFS and OS were 3.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.7-4.2 mo) and 8.7 months (95% CI: 4.7 mo-not estimable), respectively. The median PFS of germline BAP1 mutants (n ¼ 4) was 2.3 months (95% CI: 1.3-3.6 mo) versus 4.1 months (95% CI: 2.7-5.5 mo) for wild-type (n ¼ 19; p ¼ 0.019). The median OS was 4.6 months (95% CI: 3.1-4.9 mo) for germline BAP1 mutation versus 9.6 months (95% CI: 5.5 mo-not estimable) in no germline mutation (p ¼ 0.0040). Olaparib was safe with no new safety concerns.Conclusions: Olaparib has limited activity in previously treated mesothelioma including patients with BAP1 mutations. Germline BAP1 mutations were associated with decreased PFS and OS.

No abstract

9054 Background: BRCA1 associated protein 1 ( BAP1), a nuclear deubiquitinase involved in DNA double-strand break repair is frequently mutated in MM. Because poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPIs) induce synthetic lethality in BRCA1/2 mutant cancers, we sought to evaluate efficacy of olaparib in patients with MM and correlate it with pathogenic germline and somatic mutations in DNA repair genes. Methods: Phase II single-center study (NCT03531840) enrolled patients with advanced pleural or peritoneal mesothelioma who had progressed on prior therapies, age >18 years, ECOG performance status <1, adequate organ and bone marrow function. Olaparib 300mg was given twice daily orally in 3 week cycles until disease progression or toxicity. Efficacy was assessed by CT scan every 6 weeks using RECIST criteria. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed on blood and tumor samples to identify pathogenic germline and somatic mutations in DNA repair genes. Primary objective was to determine response rate based on germline or somatic mutation status of DNA repair genes. Results: Between July 2018 to May 2019, 23 patients were enrolled, 15 pleural and 8 peritoneal MM [14 male; median age 63 (range 41-75 years); median number of prior treatments 3 (range 1-5)]. Median olaparib cycles received was 4 (2-21). WES to identify pathogenic mutations in the germline and tumor was performed in 23 and 17 patients respectively. Four patients had germline BAP1, 1 germline MRE11A, and 5 had somatic BAP1 mutations. Of 22 evaluable patients, 1(4%) had partial response (PR), 17 (77%) had stable disease at 6 weeks and 4 (18%) had progressive disease. Patient with PR had a germline mutation in MRE11A. Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for all patients was 3.4 months (95% CI: 2.7 – 4.8 months) and 8.1 months (95% CI: 4.5 months – not estimable) respectively. Median PFS of germline BAP1 mutant patients (n = 4) was 2.3 months (95% CI: 1.3 – 3.6 months) compared to 4.1 months (95% CI: 2.7 – 5.5 months) for BAP1wild type patients (n = 18;P = 0.026). Median OS was 4.6 months (95% CI: 3.1 – 4.9 months) for patients with germline BAP1 mutation versus not reached for those without germline BAP1 mutation (P = 0.0058). The most common side effects of olaparib were anemia (16%), lymphopenia (24%), nausea (14%), and increased creatinine (9%). Conclusions: Olaparib has limited anti-tumor activity in previously treated MM patients including those with germline or somatic BAP1 mutations. Presence of germline BAP1 mutations was associated with decreased PFS and OS. Clinical trial information: NCT03531840.

Background: We assessed whether serial ctDNA monitoring of plasma and saliva predicts response and resistance to osimertinib in EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. Three ctDNA technologies—blood-based droplet-digital PCR (ddPCR), next-generation sequencing (NGS), and saliva-based EFIRM liquid biopsy (eLB)—were employed to investigate their complementary roles. Methods: Plasma and saliva samples were collected from patients enrolled in a prospective clinical trial of osimertinib and local ablative therapy upon progression (NCT02759835). Plasma was analyzed by ddPCR and NGS. Saliva was analyzed by eLB. Results: A total of 25 patients were included. We analyzed 534 samples by ddPCR (n = 25), 256 samples by NGS (n = 24) and 371 samples by eLB (n = 22). Among 20 patients who progressed, ctDNA progression predated RECIST 1.1 progression by a median of 118 days (range: 61–272 days) in 11 (55%) patients. Of nine patients without ctDNA progression by ddPCR, two patients had an increase in mutant EGFR by eLB and two patients were found to have ctDNA progression by NGS. Levels of ctDNA measured by ddPCR and NGS at early time points, but not volumetric tumor burden, were associated with PFS. EGFR/ERBB2/MET/KRAS amplifications, EGFR C797S, PIK3CA E545K, PTEN V9del, and CTNNB1 S45P were key resistance mechanisms identified by NGS. Conclusion: Serial assessment of ctDNA in plasma and saliva predicts response and resistance to osimertinib, with each assay having supplementary roles.

No abstract