2010
DOI: 10.1080/18756891.2010.9727744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multi-Criteria Decision Model for Architecturing Competence in Human Performance Technology

Abstract: In a continuously changing environment, like globalization, technological innovation, restructuring and outsourcing, organizations can no longer cope without continually developing their competencies and human resources. As a result academic research and company practices have actively started to develop decision making models in operation and practices to meet toughening competence demands that, moreover, need to be developed at an ever faster pace. In this research paper, we bring together several processes … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is constructed as a network of clusters and this network shows the dependence and feedback of clusters. The advantage of ANP compared to AHP is that, the network with dependence and feedback improves the priorities derived from judgments and makes the prediction more accurate . It can handle the problems that cannot be modeled as a hierarchy because they include dependence of higher level elements in a hierarchy on lower level elements.…”
Section: The Proposed Decision Making Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is constructed as a network of clusters and this network shows the dependence and feedback of clusters. The advantage of ANP compared to AHP is that, the network with dependence and feedback improves the priorities derived from judgments and makes the prediction more accurate . It can handle the problems that cannot be modeled as a hierarchy because they include dependence of higher level elements in a hierarchy on lower level elements.…”
Section: The Proposed Decision Making Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many real life decision problems cannot be structured as a hierarchy because of the fact that these problems involve the interaction and dependence of higher level elements in a hierarchy on lower level elements. So the hierarchy becomes more like a network [9]. In this context, ANP and its super-matrix technique can be considered as an extension of AHP that can handle a more complex decision structure [5,10].…”
Section: Criteria Weight Determination Using Anpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 ANP has the ability of capturing numerous decision making problems by incorporating a feedback mechanism and interactions among the dimensions as well as the hierarchical relationship of alternatives. 33,34,35,36,37,38 By using ANP, multiple expert and multiple criteria features of decision making problems can be handled together to formulate a network of factors/dimensions and criteria. 49 proposed a novel MCDM model, including DEMATEL, ANP, and VIKOR for exploring portfolio selection based on capital asset pricing model (CAPM).…”
Section: Analytic Network Process (Anp)mentioning
confidence: 99%