2008
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2008.915670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Model-Predictive Hypnosis Control System Under Total Intravenous Anesthesia

Abstract: In ambulatory surgery, anesthetic drugs must be administered at a suitable rate to prevent adverse reactions after discharge from the hospital. To realize more appropriate anesthesia, we have developed a hypnosis control system, which administers propofol as an anesthetic drug to regulate the bispectral index (BIS), an electroencephalography (EEG)-derived index reflecting the hypnosis of a patient. This system consists of three functions: 1) a feedback controller using a model-predictive control method, which … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to the high complexity of this procedure an automated system for drug administration would be a good support for the clinicians (see Meijler [6]). The development of controllers for the automatic administration of drugs in patients has deserved the attention of several researchers and led to a number of contributions and controllers namely a predictive control in Ionescu et al [7], an adaptive model-based controller in Mortier et al [8] and Simanski et al [9], a PID in Padula et al [10], a neural in Ortolani et al [11], a fuzzy logic in Shieh et al [12], a model predictive control in Sawaguchi et al [13] and Chang et al [14], but in these contributions the control of the DoA is not fully automatic. More concretely, the administration of the hypnotic is made automatically, but the administration of the analgesic is manually made by a clinician.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the high complexity of this procedure an automated system for drug administration would be a good support for the clinicians (see Meijler [6]). The development of controllers for the automatic administration of drugs in patients has deserved the attention of several researchers and led to a number of contributions and controllers namely a predictive control in Ionescu et al [7], an adaptive model-based controller in Mortier et al [8] and Simanski et al [9], a PID in Padula et al [10], a neural in Ortolani et al [11], a fuzzy logic in Shieh et al [12], a model predictive control in Sawaguchi et al [13] and Chang et al [14], but in these contributions the control of the DoA is not fully automatic. More concretely, the administration of the hypnotic is made automatically, but the administration of the analgesic is manually made by a clinician.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The volume V 4 of effect-site compartment is assumed to be one hundredth of the volume V 1 of central compartment [6]. Although many sets of parameters have been proposed [6,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], the best parameter set is still open for discussion. In this study, sixteen model parameter sets given in Table 1 are considered.…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic Models Of Propofolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These individualized parameters may help to improve the model's prediction capability and promote optimal control in drug administration [86]. Several individualized controllers [30,86,87,101] have been proposed in the literature.…”
Section: Model Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%