2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A methodology for evaluating environmental co-benefits in the transport sector: application to the Delhi metro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This way, almost 35 percent of the electricity consumed is regenerated by the system (Sreedharan 2009). Doll and Balaban (2013) provide an excellent analysis of the overall carbon footprint of the DM. For the year 2011, they estimate that the DM saved 232,162 tons of 2 CO because of its regenerative braking technology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This way, almost 35 percent of the electricity consumed is regenerated by the system (Sreedharan 2009). Doll and Balaban (2013) provide an excellent analysis of the overall carbon footprint of the DM. For the year 2011, they estimate that the DM saved 232,162 tons of 2 CO because of its regenerative braking technology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doll et al [17] proved that directing and encouraging new commercial and residential developments along the metro corridors and lines attracts more riders from private modes to public transportation systems and increases ridership. Maria [18] performed an ex-post costbenefit analysis in which their land-use simulations suggested that the benefits of land use are much more significant when considering metro construction.…”
Section: Reviews Of Related Literaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These overlapping effects allow for the identification of co-benefits between actions designed to reduce carbon emissions and consequent health outcomes. "Co-benefits" is a term increasingly widely used in discussions on climate change policy -it essentially refers to the planned ancillary benefits of any given policy 36 . In reality, most policies imply a range of outcomes (intended and unintended; positive and negative); therefore, understanding the effects of policies in sectors beyond their original scope is critical.…”
Section: Scaling/boundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifth, in moving towards systems approaches in urban health, tools that explicitly and quantitatively estimate health co-benefits can improve sectoral integration and decision-making 36 . However, to move beyond the modelling stage, consideration needs to be given to how such measures can be implemented at the city scale.…”
Section: On This Basis Several Pils Were Filed In the 1980s To Draw mentioning
confidence: 99%