In exposure or risk assessments, both environmental and biological measurements are often used. Environmental measurements are an excellent means for evaluating regulatory compliance, but the models used to esimae body b n from ee arec Unless .ll possible routes of exposure (i.e., inhalation, derma abso n, inetion) are evaluated, eosure to a toxicant can be underestimated. To crcumvent this problem, measurements of the internal dose of a toxicant in blood, serum, urine, or tissues can be used sinlaly or in combination with environmentl data for exposure assessment. In three separate laboratories, carbaryl or its primary metabolite, l-naphthol, was measured i personal air, dermal samples, blood serum, and urine from farmer applicators and their fimilies. The u ess of both environmenl ad biological data has been demonstrated. For the farmer applicator, he environmental levels of carbaryl would have been sufficient to determine that. an exposure had occurred. However, biological measurements were necessary to determine the absorbed dose of eacmember of the applicator's family. In addition, a correlation between serum and urinary 1--naphthol measurements has been shown; therefore, either matrix can be used to accurately evaluate occupational carbaryl exposure.