1971
DOI: 10.1007/bf01559071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for the determination of l-naphthol in urine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0
2

Year Published

1973
1973
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This decrease could possibly be a result of continued elimination from a previous exposure. After carbaryl application, the applicator's urinary 1-naphthol concentration rose sharply and peaked at 22,000 p'g/l (9,300 pg/g creatinine), a level comparable to other reported occupational carbaryl exposures (12,13). As the applicator's serum 1-naphthol levels dramatically decreased in the days following application, the urinary 1-naphthol level remained much higher than that of preexposure samples as 1-naphthol was being eliminated from the body.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…This decrease could possibly be a result of continued elimination from a previous exposure. After carbaryl application, the applicator's urinary 1-naphthol concentration rose sharply and peaked at 22,000 p'g/l (9,300 pg/g creatinine), a level comparable to other reported occupational carbaryl exposures (12,13). As the applicator's serum 1-naphthol levels dramatically decreased in the days following application, the urinary 1-naphthol level remained much higher than that of preexposure samples as 1-naphthol was being eliminated from the body.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Because naphthalene can be absorbed through the skin, it is widely accepted that personal air monitoring alone cannot provide sufficient protection of employees from health risks that result from occupational naphthalene exposure. 1-Hydroxynaphthalene (1-naphthol) and 2-hydroxynaphthalene (2-naphthol) have often been used as urinary biomarkers of occupational exposure to naphthalene in the past (Bieniek 1994(Bieniek , 1997(Bieniek , 1998Hansen et al 1994a, b;Heikkila¨et al 1995Heikkila¨et al , 1997Kim et al 1999Kim et al , 2001Nan et al 2001;Preuss et al 2003c;Serdar et al 2003;Shafik et al 1971). The present knowledge, in terms of occurrence, production, use, environmental and occupational exposure of humans, metabolism and hypothesised mechanisms of carcinogenesis of naphthalene, were recently reviewed by Preuss et al (2003a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Numerous analytical methodologies for biological monitoring of urinary phenolic chemicals in occupationally exposed populations have been published [1][2][3][4][5]. The limits of detection (LODs) of these methods range from 1 g/L to 60 g/L.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%