22nd AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference 2002
DOI: 10.2514/6.2002-2793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Method for Estimation of the Calibration Uncertainty of an External Six-Component Wind Tunnel Balance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained in [11] were validated using two methods: Monte Carlo [18] and Neural Networks. These results are presented in [13].…”
Section: The Purpose Of the Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results obtained in [11] were validated using two methods: Monte Carlo [18] and Neural Networks. These results are presented in [13].…”
Section: The Purpose Of the Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evolution of the analysis of balance calibration uncertainty at TA-2 and TTP facilities can be seen in [11][12][13][14]. These references present the data reduction employed to predict the aerodynamic forces and moments and associated uncertainties by applying least squares fitting to the calibration data [15,16].…”
Section: The Purpose Of the Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The other more involved methods of obtaining the balance uncertainty rely on the uncertainties of the curve fitting parameters of the calibration matrix or the goodness of the fit of the leastsquare multivariate regression Reis et al, 2004;Kammeyer and Rueger, 2008;Reis, Castro and Mello, 2013). The application of these methodologies will result in balance uncertainties that depend on the readings of the strain gages during a test (Reis et al, 2002). Once better estimates of the precision and bias limits become available in the future, the uncertainty results can be easily updated and improved, since the limits are entered as inputs in the algorithm.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%