24th AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference 2004
DOI: 10.2514/6.2004-2300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of an External Six-Component Wind Tunnel Balance Calibration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evolution of the analysis of balance calibration uncertainty at TA-2 and TTP facilities can be seen in [11][12][13][14]. These references present the data reduction employed to predict the aerodynamic forces and moments and associated uncertainties by applying least squares fitting to the calibration data [15,16].…”
Section: The Purpose Of the Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evolution of the analysis of balance calibration uncertainty at TA-2 and TTP facilities can be seen in [11][12][13][14]. These references present the data reduction employed to predict the aerodynamic forces and moments and associated uncertainties by applying least squares fitting to the calibration data [15,16].…”
Section: The Purpose Of the Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expressed by Belter (1998) at the Boeing Aerodynamics Laboratory, obtaining the precision limit of the force measurements from the balance calibration residuals generally yields the most conservative estimates of repeatability. The other more involved methods of obtaining the balance uncertainty rely on the uncertainties of the curve fitting parameters of the calibration matrix or the goodness of the fit of the leastsquare multivariate regression Reis et al, 2004;Kammeyer and Rueger, 2008;Reis, Castro and Mello, 2013). The application of these methodologies will result in balance uncertainties that depend on the readings of the strain gages during a test (Reis et al, 2002).…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%